Bryant et al v. Newsom et al
ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria finding as moot 39 Motion for Joinder; granting 40 Stipulation to dismiss with prejudice claims against City defendants. (vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020)
SUE A. GALLAGHER, City Attorney (SBN 121469)
JOHN J. FRITSCH, Assistant City Attorney (SBN 172182)
City of Santa Rosa
100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 8
Santa Rosa, California 95404
Telephone: (707) 543 3040
Facsimile: (707) 543 3055
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SANTA ROSA (erroneously sued herein as SANTA ROSA POLICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DANA BRYANT AND MICHAEL
BRYANT dba CROSSING THE
CASE NO. 3:20 cv 3243 VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH
42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAVIN NEWSOM, in official capacity
as Governor of California, et al.
[DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL]
Judge: The Hon. Vince Chhabria
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to the
above entitled action, by their respective counsel, as follows:
All claims against Defendant City of Santa Rosa (erroneously sued herein
as Santa Rosa Police Department) and all City of Santa Rosa related Does
Department shall be dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant, and Defendant City shall bear
their own attorney’s fees and costs; waive any claim for attorney’s fees
and costs; and waive any appellate rights.
Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant, and each of them, hereby
release and waive any claim Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant
may have whether known or unknown against City and any employee or
Bryant, et al, v. Newsom, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-03243 VC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?