Bryant et al v. Newsom et al

Filing 42

ORDER by Judge Vince Chhabria finding as moot 39 Motion for Joinder; granting 40 Stipulation to dismiss with prejudice claims against City defendants. (vclc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2020)

Download PDF
SUE A. GALLAGHER, City Attorney (SBN 121469) JOHN J. FRITSCH, Assistant City Attorney (SBN 172182) City of Santa Rosa 100 Santa Rosa Avenue, Room 8 Santa Rosa, California 95404 Telephone: (707) 543 3040 Facsimile: (707) 543 3055 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SANTA ROSA (erroneously sued herein as SANTA ROSA POLICE DEPARTMENT) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANA BRYANT AND MICHAEL BRYANT dba CROSSING THE JORDON, CASE NO. 3:20 cv 3243 VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs, v. 42 U.S.C. § 1983 GAVIN NEWSOM, in official capacity as Governor of California, et al. Defendants. [DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL] / Judge: The Hon. Vince Chhabria IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to the above entitled action, by their respective counsel, as follows: 1. All claims against Defendant City of Santa Rosa (erroneously sued herein as Santa Rosa Police Department) and all City of Santa Rosa related Does Department shall be dismissed with prejudice. 2. Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant, and Defendant City shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs; waive any claim for attorney’s fees and costs; and waive any appellate rights. 3. Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant, and each of them, hereby release and waive any claim Plaintiffs Dana Bryant and Michael Bryant may have whether known or unknown against City and any employee or 1 Bryant, et al, v. Newsom, et al., Case No. 3:20-cv-03243 VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?