Wilkins v. Santa Clara Sheriffs Department, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/16/2021. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 In Re Case No. 20-cv-01939-EMC 8 DEON MCNEIL WILKINS, Case No. 20-cv-03256-EMC 9 Plaintiff. ORDER OF DISMISSAL 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 On November 18, 2020, mail was sent from the Court to Plaintiff at the address he 14 provided to the Court and was returned undelivered on December 7, 2020, bearing a stamp that 15 read “return to sender, not at this address.” Docket No. 19 in Case No. 20-cv-1939 EMC. 16 Plaintiff has not provided any address other than the address to which the undeliverable mail was 17 sent. More than sixty days have passed since the mail was returned to the Court undelivered. 18 Plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 3-11(a) which requires a party proceeding pro se to 19 “promptly file with the Court and serve upon all opposing parties a Notice of Change of Address 20 specifying the new address” when his address changes. Local Rule 3-11(b) allows the Court to 21 dismiss a complaint without prejudice when mail directed to a pro se party is returned as not 22 deliverable and the pro se party fails to send written notice of his current address within sixty days 23 of the return of the undelivered mail. These actions are DISMISSED without prejudice because 24 Plaintiff failed to keep the Court informed of his address in compliance with Local Rule 3-11(a). 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 16, 2021 ______________________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?