Rodriguez et al v. Google LLC et al

Filing 186

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse granting in part and denying in part #152 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying #176 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying #179 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (agtlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2021)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 20-cv-04688-RS (AGT)
ORDER RE: OUTSTANDING
MOTIONS TO SEAL

v.
GOOGLE LLC,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 152, 176, 179

Defendant.

12

The request to seal portions of the plaintiffs’ motion for relief from the case management

13

schedule (Dkt. 152) is granted in part. Google’s internal project name may be redacted on page

14

fifteen of the motion and in paragraph twenty of the Mao declaration. Exhibit F to the motion may

15

be redacted in full. With these exceptions, Google, the designating party, hasn’t convinced the Court

16

that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the confidential information appearing in, and attached

17

to, the motion is publicly disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Ests. of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d

18

1206, 1210–11 (9th Cir. 2002).

19

The request to seal portions of the plaintiffs’ reply brief in support of the motion for relief

20

from the case management schedule (Dkt. 176, as modified by Dkt. 179) is denied. Google, the

21

designating party, hasn’t convinced the Court that specific prejudice or harm will result if the con-

22

fidential information appearing in, and attached to, the reply brief is publicly disclosed.

23
24
25
26

By December 8, 2021, the plaintiffs must file versions of their motion and reply brief that
comply with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 1, 2021

27
28

ALEX G. TSE
United States Magistrate Judge