Jordan v. WP Company LLC
Filing
57
ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL TO SETTLEMENT AND JUDGMENT by Judge William H. Orrick re: 53 Motion for Settlement. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2021)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
DEBORAH JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 20-cv-05218-WHO
v.
WP COMPANY LLC,
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
APPROVAL TO SETTLEMENT AND
JUDGMENT
Defendant.
12
13
On July 8, 2021, I granted preliminary approval of the proposed class action settlement
14
agreement between the parties (the “Settlement Agreement” or “Settlement”). I also provisionally
15
certified a Settlement Class for settlement purposes, approved the procedure for giving notice and
16
forms of Notice, and set a final approval hearing to take place on November 17, 2021. The
17
Settlement Class is defined as: all Persons who, from July 29, 2016, to and through April 1, 2021,
18
enrolled in any of Defendant’s digital subscription offerings using a California billing address and
19
who, during that time period, were charged and paid one or more automatic renewal fee(s) in
20
connection with such subscription. Excluded from this definition are the Released Parties.
21
Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves from the Settlement, pursuant to the
22
procedures set forth in Paragraph 4.5 of the Settlement, shall no longer thereafter be Settlement
23
Class Members and shall not be bound by the Settlement and shall not be eligible to make a claim
24
for any benefit under the terms of the Settlement.
25
On November 17, 2021, I held a duly noticed final approval hearing to consider: (1)
26
whether the terms and conditions of the Settlement are fair, reasonable and adequate; (2) whether a
27
judgment should be entered dismissing the complaint on the merits and with prejudice in favor of
28
Defendant and against all persons or entities who are Settlement Class members herein who have
1
not requested exclusion from the Settlement Class; and (3) whether and in what amount to award
2
attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses to Class Counsel and whether and in what amount to make an
3
incentive award to Plaintiff Deborah Jordan.
4
Having considered all matters submitted to it at the hearing and otherwise, and it appearing
5
that the Class Notice substantially in the form approved by the Court was given in the manner that
6
the Court ordered to persons who purchased the WaPo Subscriptions at issue, as ordered by the
7
Court, and having considered and determined that the proposed settlement of the claims of the
8
Settlement Class Members against Defendant, as well as the release of Defendant and the
9
Released Parties, are fair, reasonable and adequate, I HEREBY ORDER, DECREE, AND
10
ADJUDGE as follows:
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
1.
The definitions in the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s Preliminary Approval
13
Order are hereby incorporated herein as though fully set forth in this Order, and all other terms and
14
phrases in this Order shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Settlement
15
Agreement and in the Court’s Preliminary Approval Order, and/or in any Order of this Court prior
16
to the entry of final Judgment.
17
2.
The Court finds that the prerequisites for a settlement class under Federal Rules of
18
Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 23(a) and (b)(3) have been satisfied, for purposes of settlement
19
only, in that: (a) the number of Settlement Class Members is so numerous that joinder of all
20
members thereof is impracticable; (b) there are questions of law and fact common to the
21
Settlement Class; (c) the claims of the Class Representative are typical of the claims of the
22
Settlement Class she seeks to represent; (d) the Class Representative has and will fairly and
23
adequately represent the interests of the Settlement Class; (e) the questions of law and fact
24
common to the Settlement Class Members predominate over any questions affecting any
25
individual Settlement Class Member; and (f) a class action is superior to the other available
26
methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy.
27
28
3.
The Court finds that the requirements of Rule 23(e) of the Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure and other laws and rules applicable to final settlement approval of class actions have
2
1
been satisfied, and the Court approves the settlement of this Action as memorialized in the
2
Settlement Agreement as being fair, just, reasonable and adequate to the Settlement Class and its
3
members. The Court further finds that the Settlement Agreement substantially fulfills the
4
purposes and objectives of the class action and provides relief to the Settlement Class without the
5
risks, burdens, costs or delays associated with continued litigation, trial and/or appeal. The
6
Settlement is not a finding or admission of liability by the Defendant or any other person, nor a
7
finding of the validity of any claims asserted in the Action or of any wrongdoing or any violation
8
of law.
9
4.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, this Court hereby finally certifies this action, for
purposes of settlement, a class action on behalf of all Persons who, from July 29, 2016, to and
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
through April 1, 2021, enrolled in any of Defendant’s digital subscription offerings using a
12
California billing address and who, during that time period, were charged and paid one or more
13
automatic renewal fee(s) in connection with such subscription. Excluded from this definition are
14
the Released Parties. Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves from the Settlement,
15
pursuant to the procedures set forth in Paragraph 4.5 of the Settlement Agreement, shall no longer
16
thereafter be Settlement Class Members and shall not be bound by the Settlement Agreement and
17
shall not be eligible to make a claim for any benefit under the terms of this Settlement Agreement.
18
19
20
5.
Frederick J. Klorczyk III of Bursor & Fisher, P.A., is appointed as Class Counsel
for the Settlement Class. Plaintiff Deborah Jordan is designated as the Class Representative.
6.
Notice of the pendency of this action as a class action and of the proposed
21
settlement was given to Settlement Class Members in a manner reasonably calculated to provide
22
the best notice practicable under the circumstances. The form and method of notifying the
23
Settlement Class of the pendency of the Action as a class action and of the terms and conditions of
24
the proposed Settlement met the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23, due process, and any other
25
applicable law, and constituted due and sufficient notice to all persons and entities entitled thereto.
26
In addition, I find that Defendant fully satisfied any obligation to provide Notice of the proposed
27
Settlement Agreement to the public officials designated under the Class Action Fairness Act, 28
28
U.S.C. § 1715, to receive such notice, as set forth in the Defendant’s Notice of Compliance with
3
1
28 U.S.C. § 1715.
2
7.
I have considered and find that Class Counsel and the Class Representative have
3
adequately represented the Class. Plaintiff, by and through her counsel, has investigated the
4
pertinent facts and law and has evaluated the risks associated with continued litigation, class
5
certification, trial, and/or appeal. I find that the Settlement Agreement was reached in the absence
6
of collusion and is the product of informed, good-faith, arms-length negotiations between the
7
parties and their capable and experienced counsel.
8
9
8.
I find that the Settlement is effective in appropriately distributing relief to the
Settlement Class in light of the claims and defenses asserted, that the method of processing
Settlement Class Member claims is reasonable and appropriate, and that the Settlement Agreement
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
treats all Settlement Class Members equitably relative to each other.
12
9.
I have evaluated this overall reaction of the Class to the Settlement and find that the
13
overall acceptance of the Settlement Agreement by Settlement Class Members supports the
14
Court’s conclusion that the Settlement Agreement is in all respects fair, reasonable, adequate, and
15
in the best interests of the Class.
16
10.
The Parties are directed to consummate the Settlement Agreement in accordance
17
with its terms and conditions, except with respect to award or payment of attorney fees and costs
18
and the incentive award for the Class Representative, discussed more below.
19
11.
Defendant shall implement (if it has not done so already) the Prospective Relief
20
described in Paragraph 2.3 of the Settlement Agreement within a reasonably practicable time from
21
the date of this order.
22
12.
JND Legal Administration (“JND”) is finally appointed to continue to serve as the
23
Claims Administrator as provided in the Settlement Agreement. The Claims Administrator is
24
directed to process all Authorized Claims in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. Class
25
Counsel and Counsel for Defendant are hereby authorized to employ all reasonable procedures in
26
connection with administration of the Settlement Agreement that are not materially inconsistent
27
with this Order or the Settlement Agreement. If the costs of implementing the Settlement exceed
28
$113,102, plaintiff’s counsel shall submit a supplemental request seeking approval for an
4
1
increased amount, supported by a declaration from JND attesting to the expenses incurred in
2
administering the Settlement.
3
13.
The Claims Administrator shall administer the Escrow Account, which is a
Qualified Settlement Fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-1. The Claims
5
Administrator, as administrator of the fund within the meaning of Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-
6
2(k)(3), shall be solely responsible for filing or causing to be filed all informational and other tax
7
returns as may be necessary or appropriate (including, without limitation, the returns described in
8
Treasury Regulation § 1.468B-2(k)) for the Escrow Account. The Claims Administrator shall also
9
be responsible for causing payment to be made from the Escrow Account of any Taxes and Tax
10
Expenses owed. None of the Releasees, Plaintiff, Class Counsel, or Counsel for Defendant shall
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
4
have any liability or responsibility for any such Taxes or Tax Expenses, or any required filings
12
regarding same.
13
14.
There shall be no recourse to any Defendant, Releasee, Released Party or their
14
counsel, or to the Class Representative or Class Counsel, or to the Claims Administrator or to this
15
Court, for any determination made by the Claims Administrator pursuant to its responsibilities
16
under the Settlement Agreement. In addition, notwithstanding anything else in this Order, if the
17
Claims Administrator or any Party has reason to believe that a false or fraudulent Claim has been
18
submitted in this Settlement, or that any Claim has been submitted under false pretenses, the
19
Claims Administrator may reject the Claim.
20
15.
The allowance or disallowance of any Fee Award or Incentive Award has been and
21
will again be considered me separately from the Court’s consideration of the fairness,
22
reasonableness and adequacy of the Settlement. Any Order or proceeding related to the
23
application for an award of fees, costs and expenses, or any appeal from any Fee Award or
24
Incentive Award or other order relating thereto, shall not operate to terminate or cancel the
25
Settlement Agreement, nor affect or delay the finality of this Final Order and Judgment. As noted
26
in the Minute Order following the Final Approval Hearing, further proceedings are contemplated
27
before the Fee Award and Incentive Awards are determined.
28
16.
The Action is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs as against
5
1
2
Defendant and the Released Parties.
17.
Class Representative and all Settlement Class Members (except any such person
3
who has filed a proper and timely request for exclusion) and all persons acting on behalf of or in
4
concert with any of the above, are hereby permanently barred and enjoined from instituting,
5
commencing or prosecuting, either directly or in any other capacity, any and all of the Released
6
Claims against any of the Released Parties. The Court finds that issuance of the permanent
7
injunction described in this paragraph is necessary and appropriate in aid of the Court’s
8
jurisdiction over this Action and to protect and effectuate this Order.
9
18.
Effective as of the Final Settlement Approval Date, each and all of the Settlement
Class Members (except any such person who has filed a proper and timely request for exclusion)
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Judgment shall have, fully, finally, and
12
forever released, relinquished, and discharged, and shall be forever barred from asserting,
13
instituting, or maintaining against any or all of the Released Parties, any and all causes of action or
14
claims for relief, whether in law or equity, including but not limited to injunctive relief, actual
15
damages, nominal damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, exemplary or multiplied
16
damages, restitution, disgorgement, expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs, and/or any other form of
17
consideration whatsoever (including Unknown Claims), whether in law or in equity, accrued or
18
un-accrued, direct, individual or representative, of every nature and description whatsoever, that
19
were brought or could have been brought in the Action relating to any and all Releasing Parties,
20
any WaPo Subscription associated with any of them, or that in any way relate to or arise out of
21
Defendant’s automatic renewal and/or continuous service programs in California from July 29,
22
2016, to and through April 1, 2021, including but not limited to any of the facts, transactions,
23
events, matters, occurrences, acts, disclosures, statements, representations, omissions or failures to
24
act related thereto. Plaintiff, the Settlement Class, and the Releasing Parties each individually
25
covenant not to bring any Released Claim and expressly agree that this Release will be, and may
26
be raised as, a complete defense to and will preclude any action or proceeding encompassed by the
27
release(s) contained herein in respect to any WaPo Subscription associated with a Class Member.
28
19.
Neither the Settlement Agreement, nor any of its terms and provisions, nor any of
6
1
the negotiations or proceedings connected with it, nor any of the documents or statements referred
2
to therein shall be:
(a)
3
offered by any person or received against Defendant as evidence or
4
construed as or deemed to be evidence of any presumption, concession, or admission by
5
Defendant of the truth of the facts alleged by the Class Representative or any Settlement Class
6
Member or the validity of any claim that has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in
7
any litigation, or other judicial or administrative proceeding, or the deficiency of any defense that
8
has been or could have been asserted in the Action or in any litigation, or of any liability,
9
negligence, fault or wrongdoing of Defendant;
(b)
10
offered by any person or received against Defendant as evidence of a
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
presumption, concession or admission of any fault, misrepresentation or omission with respect to
12
any statement or written document approved or made by Defendant or any other wrongdoing by
13
Defendant;
(c)
14
offered by any person or received against Defendant as evidence of a
15
presumption, concession, or admission with respect to any liability, negligence, fault, or
16
wrongdoing, or in any way referred to for any other reason against any of the settling parties, in
17
any civil, criminal, or administrative action or proceeding; provided, however, that nothing
18
contained in this paragraph shall prevent the Settlement Agreement from being used, offered, or
19
received in evidence in any proceeding to approve, enforce, or otherwise effectuate the Settlement
20
or the Settlement Approval Order and Final Judgment, or in which the reasonableness, fairness, or
21
good faith of the parties in participating in the Settlement (or any agreement or order relating
22
thereto) is an issue, or to enforce or effectuate provisions of the Settlement, the Settlement
23
Approval Order and Final Judgment, the releases as to the Released Parties.
24
20.
Claims documents in this case, and all materials and data held by the Claims
25
Administrator regarding the Settlement Class, including the Class List, shall be strictly
26
confidential and not subject to publication or disclosure, and shall not be used for any other
27
purposes beyond providing notice to the Settlement Class and assisting with the determination of
28
valid claims. No person other than the Parties and their counsel, the Claims Administrator, and
7
1
the Court shall be permitted to obtain or review any Claim Form, or any decision of the Claims
2
Administrator with respect to accepting or rejecting any Claim, except as provided for herein or
3
upon Court Order for good cause shown.
4
21.
This Settlement Approval Order and Judgment constitutes a judgment within the
5
meaning and for purposes of Rule 54 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Without affecting
6
the finality of the Settlement Approval Order and Judgment in any way, this Court hereby retains
7
continuing jurisdiction over: (a) the disposition of the settlement benefits; (b) the settling parties
8
for purposes of construing, enforcing and administering the Settlement Agreement; (c) the Fee
9
Award and Incentive Award; and (d) the enforcement of the Stipulation and Order Regarding
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Undertaking Re: Attorneys’ Fees and Costs.
22.
Without further order of the Court, the settling parties may agree to reasonably
necessary extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement.
23.
In the event that the Final Settlement Approval Date does not occur, this Settlement
14
Approval Order and Final Judgment shall automatically be rendered null and void and shall be
15
vacated and, in such event, all orders entered in connection herewith, except the Stipulation and
16
Order Regarding Undertaking Re: Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, shall be null and void.
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 19, 2021
21
22
William H. Orrick
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?