Miller v. C R Bard Inc et al
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 14, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
TIMOTHY MILLER,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 20-cv-06250-MMC
v.
C R BARD INC, et al.,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
Defendants.
12
13
On April 3, 2020, plaintiff Timothy Miller ("Miller"), along with nine other plaintiffs,
14
filed a complaint in Texas state court, which complaint subsequently was removed to the
15
Northern District of Texas. By order filed August 31, 2020, the Northern District of Texas
16
granted plaintiffs' "Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue of Out-of-State Plaintiffs' Cases,"
17
and, in so doing, severed Miller's claims and transferred them to the Northern District of
18
California, resulting in the above-titled action.
19
Prior to the transfer of Miller's claims to this District, defendants C.R. Bard, Inc.
20
and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, "Bard") had filed a "Motion to Dismiss the
21
Out-of-State Plaintiffs' Claims for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction." As the Northern District
22
of Texas's order granting plaintiffs' motion to sever effectively resolved the issues raised
23
in Bard's motion, said motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED as moot.
24
Additionally, prior to the transfer of Miller's claims, defendant McKesson
25
Corporation ("McKesson") filed a "Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice Plaintiffs' Claims
26
for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction," whereby McKesson, a citizen of Texas, asserted
27
it had been "fraudulently joined to this action" (see McKesson's Mot. at 1), which action
28
included claims asserted on behalf of Peggy Aguilar, a citizen of Texas. In light of the
1
Northern District of Texas's order granting plaintiffs' motion to sever, however, Peggy
2
Aguilar is not a party to the instant action, and complete diversity of citizenship exists as
3
to the four parties thereto. Accordingly, McKesson's motion to dismiss for lack of subject
4
matter jurisdiction is hereby DENIED as moot.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: September 14, 2020
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?