Miller v. C R Bard Inc et al

Filing 39

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 14, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2020)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TIMOTHY MILLER, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 20-cv-06250-MMC v. C R BARD INC, et al., ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendants. 12 13 On April 3, 2020, plaintiff Timothy Miller ("Miller"), along with nine other plaintiffs, 14 filed a complaint in Texas state court, which complaint subsequently was removed to the 15 Northern District of Texas. By order filed August 31, 2020, the Northern District of Texas 16 granted plaintiffs' "Motion to Sever and Transfer Venue of Out-of-State Plaintiffs' Cases," 17 and, in so doing, severed Miller's claims and transferred them to the Northern District of 18 California, resulting in the above-titled action. 19 Prior to the transfer of Miller's claims to this District, defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. 20 and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. (collectively, "Bard") had filed a "Motion to Dismiss the 21 Out-of-State Plaintiffs' Claims for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction." As the Northern District 22 of Texas's order granting plaintiffs' motion to sever effectively resolved the issues raised 23 in Bard's motion, said motion to dismiss is hereby DENIED as moot. 24 Additionally, prior to the transfer of Miller's claims, defendant McKesson 25 Corporation ("McKesson") filed a "Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice Plaintiffs' Claims 26 for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction," whereby McKesson, a citizen of Texas, asserted 27 it had been "fraudulently joined to this action" (see McKesson's Mot. at 1), which action 28 included claims asserted on behalf of Peggy Aguilar, a citizen of Texas. In light of the 1 Northern District of Texas's order granting plaintiffs' motion to sever, however, Peggy 2 Aguilar is not a party to the instant action, and complete diversity of citizenship exists as 3 to the four parties thereto. Accordingly, McKesson's motion to dismiss for lack of subject 4 matter jurisdiction is hereby DENIED as moot. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: September 14, 2020 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?