AirWair International Ltd. v. Zoetop Business Co., Limited d/b/a SHEIN and ROMWE, a Hong Kong corporation
Filing
99
ORDER (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LIMITED STAY; AND (2) REQUIRING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR RELIEF (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
AIRWAIR INTERNATIONAL LTD.,
6
Plaintiff,
7
8
9
v.
ZOETOP BUSINESS CO., LIMITED,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
12
ORDER (1) GRANTING
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR
LIMITED STAY AND (2) REQUIRING
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO
MOTION FOR RELEIF
Re: Dkt. Nos. 97, 98
10
11
Case No. 20-cv-07696-SI
On January 6, 2022, defendant Zoetop filed a motion for relief from the magistrate judge’s
nondispositive order requiring the production of documents pursuant to AirWair’s RFP Nos. 10 and
13
19. Dkt. No. 97 (Motion for Relief); Dkt. No. 89 at 4-5 (Contested Nondispositive Order). That
14
same day, defendant also filed a motion to stay the production of the documents identified in the
15
16
magistrate’s nondispositive order pending the resolution of the motion for relief. Dkt. No. 98
(Motion to Stay). The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff AirWair to file a response to defendant’s
17
motion for relief no later than January 14, 2022. Local Rule 72-2. The response should address any
18
perceived deficiencies in defendant’s proposal that the Court “limit any additional production to
19
cease and desist letters and filed Complaints alleging trademark infringement of footwear products
20
against Zoetop only (the only defendant in this case) since January 1, 2016.” Dkt. No. 97 at 6. The
21
Court GRANTS the motion to stay pending the resolution of the motion for relief.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: January 7, 2022
25
26
27
28
______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?