Cotton v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES ONLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 16, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2021)
Case 3:20-cv-09169-MMC Document 22 Filed 02/16/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CLYDE V. COTTON,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 20-cv-09169-MMC
CHARLES W. SCHARF, et al.,
ORDER CLOSING CONSOLIDATED
CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES
By order filed concurrently herewith, the following cases were consolidated for all
purposes: (1) Himstreet v. Scharf, Case No. 3:20-cv-08750-MMC; (2) Montini Family
Trust, v Scharf, Case No. 3: 20-cv-08752-MMC; and (3) Cotton v. Scharf, Case No. 3:20-
cv-09169 MMC. Said order further provides that "[t]he files of the Consolidated Action
shall be maintained in one file under Master File No. 3:20-cv-08750-MMC." (See Order
to Consolidate, filed February 16, 2021, at 2:13-14.)
In light of the consolidation, the Court hereby CLOSES Case No. 3:20-cv-09169MMC for statistical purposes only.
Nothing contained in this order shall be considered a dismissal or disposition of
any action or of any claim made within Case No. 3:20-cv-09169-MMC. Should further
proceedings become necessary or desirable in Case No. 3:20-cv-09169-MMC, any party
may initiate them in the same manner as if this order had not been entered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 16, 2021
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?