Wade v. Alsup et al

Filing 3

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/14/2020. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

E. K. WADE,
Plaintiff,

8

WILLIAM H. ALSUP, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

v.

9
10

Case No. 20-mc-80181-EMC

12
The Court recently dismissed two lawsuits initiated by Plaintiff against judges in this

13
14

District, Ninth Circuit judges, and USAO attorneys. See Wade v. Alsup, No. 20-mc-80167 EMC

15

(N.D. Cal.) (Docket No. 5); Wade v. Alsup, No. 20-mc-80178 EMC (N.D. Cal.) (Docket No.

16

4). In the instant case, Plaintiff again sues the same defendants based on the same underlying

17

facts.

18

The Court rules consistent with its orders in the two above-referenced cases. That is, the

19

Court has reviewed the complaint and finds that it does not state a potentially cognizable

20

claim. Therefore, in accordance with the Order filed on June 24, 2010, in Wade v. Gilliland, No.

21

C-10-0425 WHA (N.D. Cal.), the Clerk is directed not to accept the complaint for filing and this

22

action is dismissed.

23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2020

26
27
28

______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge