Hess v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Filing 35

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc5S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2021)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

DESDNIE HESS,
Plaintiff,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
Defendant.

15
16

No. 21-0093 WHA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

On April 29, an order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety.

17

That order invited plaintiff to move for leave to amend within fourteen days of the date of the

18

order. It is now June 3, and plaintiff has not moved for leave to amend her complaint.

19
20
21
22

Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE.

If plaintiff fails to file a written response to this order by JUNE 10, the case shall be
dismissed, and the CLERK SHALL CLOSE THE FILE.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: June 3, 2021

27
28

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE