Carrillo v. Napa Superior Court

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/15/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

FRANCISCO CARRILLO,
Petitioner,

8

Re: Dkt. No. 7
NAPA SUPERIOR COURT,
Respondent.

11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

9
10

Case No. 21-cv-02092-JD

12
13

This is a habeas petition filed pro se by a detainee. In the initial review order, the Court

14

found that petitioner had failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances to warrant federal

15

court intervention into his pending state criminal case. The petition was dismissed with leave to

16

amend to provide petitioner a final opportunity to show extraordinary circumstances. The time to

17

amend has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated

18

with the Court. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the reasons stated in the prior

19

order. The pending motion (Dkt. No. 7) is VACATED and a certificate of appealability is

20

DENIED.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 15, 2021

23
24
25
26
27
28

JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge