Carrillo v. Napa Superior Court

Filing 9

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge James Donato on 7/15/2021. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANCISCO CARRILLO, Petitioner, 8 Re: Dkt. No. 7 NAPA SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 9 10 Case No. 21-cv-02092-JD 12 13 This is a habeas petition filed pro se by a detainee. In the initial review order, the Court 14 found that petitioner had failed to demonstrate extraordinary circumstances to warrant federal 15 court intervention into his pending state criminal case. The petition was dismissed with leave to 16 amend to provide petitioner a final opportunity to show extraordinary circumstances. The time to 17 amend has passed and petitioner has not filed an amended petition or otherwise communicated 18 with the Court. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the reasons stated in the prior 19 order. The pending motion (Dkt. No. 7) is VACATED and a certificate of appealability is 20 DENIED. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 15, 2021 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES DONATO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?