Daria v. Sapient Corp et al

Filing 86

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Case 3:21-cv-02712-WHA Document 86 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10

HALEY DARIA,
Plaintiff,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14

No. C 21–02712 WHA

v.
SAPIENT CORP, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS
FOR RECONSIDERATION

15
16

None of plaintiff’s arguments or materials in support of her motions for reconsideration

17

change the undersigned judge’s reasoning on the motion to dismiss or the motions for a

18

prefiling order. Though defendants have not yet submitted responses, the motion can be

19

decided on the papers based on plaintiff’s submissions. There is no need for oral argument.

20

The motion for reconsideration is DENIED.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Dated: September 7, 2021

25
26
27
28

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE