Daria v. Sapient Corp et al

Filing 86

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION. By Judge Alsup. (whalc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-02712-WHA Document 86 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 HALEY DARIA, Plaintiff, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 No. C 21–02712 WHA v. SAPIENT CORP, et al., Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 15 16 None of plaintiff’s arguments or materials in support of her motions for reconsideration 17 change the undersigned judge’s reasoning on the motion to dismiss or the motions for a 18 prefiling order. Though defendants have not yet submitted responses, the motion can be 19 decided on the papers based on plaintiff’s submissions. There is no need for oral argument. 20 The motion for reconsideration is DENIED. 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 Dated: September 7, 2021 25 26 27 28 WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?