Carlson v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 54

ORDER granting 53 parties' Stipulation to continue the 12/15/2022 10:00 AM Settlement Conference to a date after 6/1/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 11/18/2022. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2022)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

DAVID CHIU, State Bar #189542
City Attorney
MEREDITH B. OSBORN, State Bar #250467
Chief Trial Deputy
RYAN STEVENS, State Bar #306409
WILLIAM M. LAYNE, State Bar #294748
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone:
[phone] [Stevens]
Telephone:
[phone] [Layne]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MICHAEL BUSHNELL, STEVEN DOMECUS,
WALLACE H. KRESLEY, PAUL MCINTOSH,
BRETT MONTAGUE, MATTHEW PARRA

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DOUGLAS F. CARLSON, MAYA
ZUBKOVSKAYA,
Plaintiffs,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, MICHAEL BUSHNELL,
STEVEN DOMECUS, WALLACE H.
KRESLEY, PAUL MCINTOSH, BRETT
MONTAGUE, MATTHEW PARRA,
DOES #1-10,

Case No. 21-cv-02876-LB
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
CONTINUE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Trial Date:

August 14, 2023

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, and respectfully requested, by and between Plaintiffs and
Defendants by and through their designated counsel, that:
WHEREAS on August 23, 2021, the court issued an order referring the above caption case to a
Mandatory Settlement Conference “to occur after summary judgment” Dkt. No. 20;

28
Stipulation and Order
CASE NO. 21-cv-02876-LB

1

n:\lit\li2021\210719\01636270.docx

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WHEREAS on July 22, 2022, the court issued an order setting a settlement conference on
December 15, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., Dkt. No. 43;
WHEREAS on September 19, 2022, the court issued an order extending all case deadlines and
setting a deadline of May 18, 2023 for dispositive motions to be heard, Dkt. No. 47
WHEREAS the parties both agree that the Mandatory Settlement Conference should not take
place before June 1, 2023.
FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REASONS, the parties stipulate and REQUEST that the

8

Court continue settlement conference to a date after June 1, 2023.

9

IT IS SO AGREED.

10

Dated: November 17, 2022

11

/s/ Douglas F. Carlson
DOUGLAS F. CARLSON
Plaintiff in Pro Per and Attorney for Plaintiff
MAYA ZUBKOVSKAYA

12
13
14

Dated: November 17, 2022
/s/ Ryan Stevens
RYAN STEVENS
Attorneys for Defendants

15
16
17

November 18, 2022
DATED: _________________

R NIA

M. Ryu
a
n
n
o
Judge D
_____________________________________
RT

DONNA M. RYU
UnitedEStates
Magistrate Judge C
R

H

24

A

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

22

I

FO

21

ERED

ORD
T IS SO

LI

20

UNIT
ED

S

19

RT
U
O

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
A
T

18

N

25

F
D IS T IC T O
R

26
27
28
Stipulation and Order
CASE NO. 21-cv-02876-LB

2

n:\lit\li2021\210719\01636270.docx