G. et al v. City of Lafayette et al
Filing
80
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT BLACK'S 63 MOTION TO DISMISS. Response due by 9/16/2022. Reply due by 9/26/2022. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/19/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)
1
2
3
PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 107713)
P.O. Box 5843
Oakland CA 94605
Telephone: (510) 452-0292
Facsimile: (510) 452-5625
E-mail: pamela@pypesq.com
4
5
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
AUDREY G., DEVIN G., VICTOR
GRAYSON as Guardian Ad Litem,
JESSE B., JAMES LARRY BENTON, JR.
as Guardian Ad Litem, and JAMES LARRY
BENTON, SR. in his Individual Capacity
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
AUDREY G., a Minor and DEVIN G., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
v.
16
CITY OF LAFAYETTE, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
NO. 3:21-cv-03545 WHO
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR
BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT BLACK’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
COMES NOW the parties to the above-entitled action hereby stipulate to enlarge the time
20
for Plaintiffs to file their opposition to Defendant Black’s Motion to Dismiss for two (2) days up to
21
September 16, 2022. The parties also stipulate and agree that Defendant Black will have three (3)
22
additional days to file a Reply Brief, if any, from September 23 to September 26, 2022.
23
Dated: September 14, 2022
24
/s/ Pamela Y. Price
PAMELA Y. PRICE, Attorney for Plaintiff
25
26
27
28
PAMELA Y. PRICE, ATTORNEY AT LAW
Dated: September 14, 2022
MARY ANN McNETT MASON
COUNTY COUNSEL
/s/ Sean M. Rodriquez
SEAN M. RODRIQUEZ, Attorney for Defendants
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (3:21-cv-03545 WHO)
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, IT
3
IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendant Black’s Motion to
4
Dismiss on or before September 16, 2022, and Defendants shall file their Reply Brief, if any, on or
5
before September 26, 2022.
6
7
8
9
Dated: September 19, 2022
HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER (3:21-cv-03545 WHO)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?