Larkin Community Hospital v. Intuitive Surgical Inc.

Filing 233

OMNIBUS SEALING ORDER. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on April 1, 2024. (amolc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 IN RE: DA VINCI SURGICAL ROBOT ANTITRUST LITIGATION 8 Case No. 21-cv-03825-AMO OMNIBUS ORDER RE: SEALING 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Before the Court are the Parties’ and Third-Parties’ Administrative Motions to Seal, 13 14 Motions to Consider Sealing Third-Party Materials, Statements in Support of Sealing, 15 Declarations in Support of Sealing, and associated exhibits, at ECF 125, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 16 135, 137, 138, 139, 143, 150, 152, 155, 165, 168, 170, 171, 179, 180, 182, 186, 187. The Court, 17 having carefully considered the submissions, the record, the applicable law, and any arguments 18 related thereto, hereby orders that the Administrative Motions are GRANTED in part and DENIED 19 in part. LEGAL STANDARD 20 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5, the party seeking to file a document or portions of it 22 under seal must explain “(i) the legitimate private or public interests that warrant sealing; (ii) the 23 injury that will result if sealing is denied; and (iii) why a less restrictive alternative to sealing is 24 not sufficient.” Civil L.R. 79-5(c)(1). The request must be “narrowly tailored to seal only the 25 sealable material.” Id. at 79-5(c)(3). 26 A party seeking to seal records must provide “compelling reasons” to overcome the 27 “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 28 1178 (9th Cir. 2006); see Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th 1 Cir. 2016). The standard derives from the “common law right ‘to inspect and copy public records 2 and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Ass’n, 605 3 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010) (quoting Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178). To overcome this strong 4 presumption, the party seeking to seal judicial records must “articulate compelling reasons 5 supported by specific factual findings . . . that outweigh the general history of access and the 6 public policies favoring disclosure, such as the public interest in understanding the judicial 7 process.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178-79 (citations omitted). The party must make a 8 “particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is 9 disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 2002). It is in the “sound discretion of the trial court” to determine what constitutes a “compelling 12 reason” for sealing a court document. Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1097 (quoting Nixon v. 13 Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 599 (1978)). Compelling reasons justifying sealing court 14 records generally exist when such “court files might . . . become a vehicle for improper purposes” 15 such as “releas[ing] trade secrets,” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179, or “as sources of business 16 information that might harm a litigant’s competitive standing,” Ctr. for Auto Safety, 809 F.3d at 17 1097; see In re Elec. Arts, Inc., 298 F. App’x 568, 569 (9th Cir. 2008) (sealing trade secret 18 information about “the pricing terms, royalty rates, and guaranteed minimum payment terms” in 19 the parties’ licensing agreement). Records attached to nondispositive motions must meet the 20 lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as such 21 records “are often unrelated, or only tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action.” 22 Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179-80 (quotations omitted). 23 DISCUSSION 24 The Court finds that compelling reasons exist to support the filing under seal of the 25 documents or portions thereof listed as “granted” in the following chart and grants the requests to 26 seal these documents or portions thereof where they appear on the public docket. The Court 27 denies the request to seal any documents or portions thereof (1) listed as “denied” in the following 28 chart or (2) provisionally filed under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f) because a Party or Third2 1 Party had designated them as confidential or highly confidential under the protective order but that 2 were not included in the below chart because no Party or Third-Party filed a statement or 3 declaration seeking to maintain them under seal pursuant to Local Rule 79-5(f). 4 The Court appreciates the efforts of counsel to prepare the chart below, including citations 5 to the relevant docket entries. The Court notes that, while it grants sealing many of the documents 6 presented at this stage, it will be disinclined to permit sealing of materials presented in a public 7 trial. 8 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-2; 125-3 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit A - Bass Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Seal, ¶ 5 information. Einer Elhauge, Exhibit 1 (Expert Report of Einer ECF No. 125 Elhauge) Administrative Motion to File Under • Page 14, redacted Seal Materials from fn. 55 Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ECF No. 125-4 Exhibit B - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) • Page 28, Figure 6 19 20 21 22 23 24 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 25 26 27 28 1 The docket numbers listed refer to the under seal version of the document at issue that was submitted in unredacted form for the Court’s review. 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 DENIED. ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 Descriptions of Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in surgical maneuvers Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to are not proprietary. the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 Administrative • Page 36, Figure 9 Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-4 Exhibit B - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) • Page 37, Figure 10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ECF No. 125-4 Exhibit B - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) • Page 84, Figure 20 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 DENIED. Descriptions of surgical maneuvers are not proprietary. ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 125-4 ECF No. 125-1 GRANTED. Exhibit B - Chaput Wong Declaration in Proprietary Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to business the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 information. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) ECF No. 125 Administrative • Page 88, Figure 21 Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-4 Exhibit B - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 8 (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) • Page 89, redacted portions of ¶ 174 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 ECF No. 125-5 Exhibit C - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) • Page 29, Figure 6 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 24 25 26 27 28 5 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 DENIED. ECF No. 125-5 ECF No. 125-1 Descriptions of Exhibit C - Chaput Wong Declaration in surgical maneuvers Declaration in Support of Support of Motion to are not proprietary. the Motion to Exclude Dr. Seal, ¶ 6 T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) ECF No. 125 Administrative • Page 37, Figure 9 Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125-5 Exhibit C - Chaput Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. T. Kim Parnell, Ex. 9 (Howe 1/18/23 SIS Rpt) • Page 38, Figure 10 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 ECF No. 125-6 Exhibit D - Lannin Declaration in Support of the Motion to Exclude Dr. Eugene Rubach, Ex. 4 (Excerpts from (Howe 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) • Page 28, Figure 6 • Page 36, Figure 9 • Page 37, Figure 10 ECF No. 125-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Motion to Seal, ¶ 6 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 DENIED. Descriptions of surgical maneuvers are not proprietary. ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 125 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Materials from Daubert Motions, pg. 1-3 24 25 26 27 28 6 Page 28, Figure 6 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. Page 37, Figure 9 Page 38, Figure 10 DENIED. Descriptions of surgical maneuvers are not proprietary. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-2; 143-15 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 1, Plaintiffs’ Declaration of Dr. Proprietary Administrative Motion to Jaime Wong in business Consider Support of Defendant information. Intuitive Surgical’s • Page 14, redacted Statement in Support fn. 55 of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motions to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed (“Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing”), ¶ 4 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-3; 143-17 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 12 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00067540 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement business 00067547), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ information. Administrative Motion to 6 Consider ECF No. 143 • Page Intuitive00067547, redacted portion Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5 ECF No. 143-4; 143-17 Exhibit 42 (Intuitive00029174), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider • Page Intuitive00029174, redacted portions. ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶ 4 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-5; 143-19 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 44 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00552697 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement product 00552715), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ development Administrative Motion to 5 information. Consider ECF No. 143 • Pages IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 00552706 – Intuitivein Support of 00552715, redacted Plaintiffs’ portions Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 ECF No. 143-6; 143-20 Exhibit 48 (Intuitive01235518 – Intuitive01235542), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider • Pages Intuitive01235528 – Intuitive01235533, redacted portions. • Pages Intuitive01235535 – Intuitive01235542, redacted portions. ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶ 6 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 9 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ECF No. 143-7; 143-21 Exhibit 68 (Intuitive00560277 – Intuitive00560390), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Pages containing redacted information: • Intuitive-00560281 • Intuitive-00560282 • Intuitive-00560291 • Intuitive-00560292 • Intuitive-00560293 • Intuitive-00560294 • Intuitive-00560295 • Intuitive-00560296 • Intuitive-00560297 • Intuitive-00560298 • Intuitive-00560299 • Intuitive-00560300 • Intuitive-00560301 • Intuitive-00560302 • Intuitive-00560303 • Intuitive-00560304 • Intuitive-00560305 • Intuitive-00560306 • Intuitive-00560307 • Intuitive-00560308 • Intuitive-00560309 • Intuitive-00560310 • Intuitive-00560311 • Intuitive-00560312 • Intuitive-00560313 • Intuitive-00560314 • Intuitive-00560315 • Intuitive-00560316 • Intuitive-00560317 • Intuitive-00560318 • Intuitive-00560320 • Intuitive-00560321 • Intuitive-00560322 • Intuitive-00560323 • Intuitive-00560324 • Intuitive-00560325 • Intuitive-00560326 • Intuitive-00560327 ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶¶ 4, 6 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-5 10 GRANTED. Proprietary business information and non-public financial information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 • Intuitive-00560330 – Intuitive-00560332 • Intuitive-00560335 – Intuitive-00560338 • Intuitive-00560343 – Intuitive-00560344 • Intuitive-00560346 • Intuitive-00560350 – Intuitive-00560351 • Intuitive-00560356 • Intuitive-00560358 – Intuitive-00560362 • Intuitive-00560365 – Intuitive-00560369 • Intuitive-00560371 – Intuitive-00560378 • Intuitive-00560386 – Intuitive-00560387 • Intuitive-00560389 – Intuitive-00560390 ECF No. 143-8; 143-22 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 69 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00366044 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement business 00366053), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ information. Administrative Motion to 4 Consider ECF No. 143 • Pages IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 00366046 – Intuitivein Support of 00366047, redacted Plaintiffs’ portions. Administrative • Pages IntuitiveMotion to Consider 00366051 – IntuitiveWhether Another 00366052, redacted Party’s Materials portions. Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 25 26 27 28 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-9; 143-23 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 73 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00519980 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement business 00520005), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ information. Administrative Motion to 4 Consider ECF No. 143 • Pages IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 00520001 – Intuitivein Support of 00520002, redacted Plaintiffs’ portions. Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 143-10; 143-24 Exhibit 76 (Intuitive00203904 – Intuitive00203906), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider • Pages Intuitive00203904 – Intuitive00203905, redacted portions ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶ 6 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4-5 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 12 GRANTED. Non-public financial information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-11; 143-25 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 90 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00552716 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement business and 00552727), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ product Administrative Motion to 5 development Consider information. ECF No. 143 • Pages IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 00552723 – Intuitivein Support of 00552727, redacted Plaintiffs’ portions. Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 ECF No. 143-12; 143-26 Exhibit 93 (Intuitive02038766 – Intuitive02038770), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider • Page Intuitive02038767, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive02038768, redacted portions. ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶¶ 4, 5 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-13; 143-27 ECF No. 143-1 GRANTED. Exhibit 96 (IntuitiveWong Declaration in Proprietary 00552728 – IntuitiveSupport of Statement business and 00552743), Plaintiffs’ to Consider Sealing, ¶ product Administrative Motion to 5 development Consider information. ECF No. 143 • Pages IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 00552735 – Intuitivein Support of 00552741 and IntuitivePlaintiffs’ 00552743, redacted Administrative portions. Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 ECF No. 143-14; 143-28 Exhibit 97 (Intuitive01265649 – Intuitive01265809), Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Pages containing redacted information: • Intuitive-01265652 – Intuitive-01265655 • Intuitive-01265657 – Intuitive-01265675 • Intuitive-01265677 – Intuitive-01265740 • Intuitive-01265742 – Intuitive-01265756 • Intuitive-01265759 – Intuitive-01265774 • Intuitive-01265776 – Intuitive-01265779 • Intuitive-01265781 – Intuitive-01265787 • Intuitive-01265789 • Intuitive-01265792 ECF No. 143-1 Wong Declaration in Support of Statement to Consider Sealing, ¶ 6 ECF No. 143 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 2-3, 5-6 28 14 GRANTED. Proprietary business and nonpublic financial information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 • • Intuitive01265794 – Intuitive01265809 Page 28, Figure 6 ECF No. 152-2 ECF No. 152-1 GRANTED. Declaration of Kathryn E. Declaration of Dr. Proprietary Cahoy in Support of Jaime Wong in business Intuitive’s Opposition to Support of Intuitive information. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Surgical’s Summary Judgment and Administrative Page 37, Figure 9 Cross-Motion for Summary Motions to Seal Page 38, Figure 10 Judgment Ex. 3 (Howe Materials From Its DENIED. 1/18/23 Larkin Rpt) Summary Judgment Descriptions of Briefs, ¶ 6 • Page 28, Figure 6 surgical maneuvers • Page 36, Figure 9 are not proprietary. ECF No. 152 • Page 37, Figure 10 Intuitive’s • Page 84, Figure 20 Page 84, Figure 20 Administrative • Page 88, Figure 21 Page 88, Figure 21 Motion to Seal • Page 89, redacted Page 89, redacted Materials From its portions of ¶ 174 portions of ¶ 174 Opposition to GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Proprietary Summary Judgment business and and Cross Motion for product Summary Judgment, development pg. 1-2 information. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 GRANTED. ECF No. 168-2 ECF No. 168-1 Proprietary Bateman Ex. 8 ISO Declaration of Dr. business Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Jaime Wong in information. Intuitive’s Motion to Support of Intuitive Exclude Testimony of Einer Surgical, Inc.’s Elhauge - Deposition of Statement in Support Nickola “Nicky” Goodson of Plaintiffs’ April 20, (October 27, 2022) 2023 Administrative Motions to Consider • Pages 183-184, Whether Another redacted portions. Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed (“Wong Dec.”), ¶ 4 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ECF No. 168 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ECF No. 125-2; 125-3 Bateman Ex. 1 ISO Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Intuitive’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Einer Elhauge - Corrected Expert Report of Professor Einer Elhauge (January 10, 2023) • Page 14, redacted fn. 55 ECF No. 168-1 Wong Decl. ¶ 4 ECF No. 168 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 25 26 (See Dkt. 125-2; Dkt. 125-7 at 1.) 27 28 16 GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 143-12; 143-26 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 15 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 4 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony in Support of Intuitive-02038766 Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative • Pages IntuitiveMotion to Consider 02038767–68, redacted Whether Another portions. Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ECF No. 143-11; 143-25 Spector Ex. 8 ISO Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Eugene Rubach - Intuitive00552716 – Intuitive00552727, NFJ for IS4000 8mm Needle Drivers • Pages Intuitive00552723 – Intuitive00552727, redacted portions. (See Dkt. 143-26; Dkt. 143-29 at 4–5) ECF No. 168-1 Wong Decl. ¶ 5 ECF No. 168 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 (See Dkt. 143-25; Dkt. 143-29 at 4) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 17 GRANTED. Proprietary business and product development information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 168-3 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 12 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 5 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony in Support of Intuitive-00493612 Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative • Page IntuitiveMotion to Consider 00493619, redacted Whether Another portions. Party’s Materials • Page Intuitive00493623, redacted portion. Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 • Page Intuitive00493625, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive00493630, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive00493633, redacted portions. ECF No. 143-3; 143-17 ECF No. 168-1 GRANTED. McCuaig Ex. 9 ISO of Wong Decl. ¶ 6 Proprietary Plaintiffs’ Opposition to business Intuitive’s Motion to ECF No. 168 information. Exclude Kimberly Intuitive’s Statement Trautman’s Testimony in Support of Intuitive-00067540 -SLSA Plaintiffs’ April 20, 2023 Administrative • Page Intuitive00067547, redacted portion Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-2, 4 (See Dkt. 143-17; Dkt. 143-29 at 1) 25 26 27 28 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-2 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Ex. 102 Declaration of Dr. Proprietary (IntuitiveJaime Wong in business and 02056740-IntuitiveSupport of Intuitive product 02056761) Surgical, Inc.’s development Statement in Support information. Pages containing redacted of information: Plaintiffs’ May 4, • Intuitive-02057644- 2023 Administrative Intuitive-02057646 Motions to • Intuitive-02057649 Consider Whether • Intuitive-02057651 Another Party’s Materials Should Be Sealed (“Wong Dec.”), Wong Dec. ¶ 6. 13 ECF No. 180 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ECF No. 180-3 Spector Decl., Ex. 123 (Intuitive00493612-Intuitive00493670) Pages containing redacted information: • Intuitive-00493619 • Intuitive-00493623 • Intuitive-00493625 • Intuitive-00493630 • Intuitive-00493633 ECF No. 180-1 Wong Dec. ¶ 6 ECF No. 180 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-4 28 19 GRANTED. Proprietary business and product development information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-4 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 130 Wong Dec. ¶ 7 Non-public – Restore Settlement financial (IntuitiveECF No. 180 information. 02072151 –IntuitiveIntuitive’s Statement 02072157) in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, • Page Intuitive2023 Administrative 02072153, redacted Motion to Consider portions Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3, 4 ECF No. 180-5 Spector Decl., Exhibit 131 – Rebotix Settlement (Intuitive02070399 –Intuitive02070405) • Pages Intuitive2070401- Intuitive02070402, redacted portions ECF No. 180-1 Wong Dec. ¶ 7 ECF No. 180-6 Spector Decl., Exhibit 146 (Intuitive-00786911 – Intuitive00786951) • Page Intuitive00786914, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive00786919, redacted portions. • Page Intuitive00786945, redacted portions. ECF No. 180-1 Wong Dec. ¶ 5 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 ECF No. 180 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3, 4 ECF No. 180 Intuitive’s Statement in Support of Plaintiffs’ May 4, 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 28 20 GRANTED. Non-public financial information. GRANTED. Proprietary business information. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Documents or Portions Thereof that Intuitive Seeks to Maintain Under Seal Document or Portion of Evidence offered in Objections Ruling Document Sought to be Support of Sealing Sealed1 ECF No. 180-7 ECF No. 180-1 GRANTED. Spector Decl., Exhibit 147 Wong Dec. ¶ 5 Proprietary (Intuitive-00785382 – business IntuitiveECF No. 180 information. 00785422) Intuitive’s Statement in Support of • Page IntuitivePlaintiffs’ May 4, 00785417 2023 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party’s Materials Should be Sealed, pg. 1-3 ECF No. 186-2 Cahoy Supp. Declaration Ex. 90 (Intuitive-00506505 excerpts) • Pages Intuitive0506539–42, redacted portions • Pages Intuitive0506593–94, redacted portions ECF No. 186-1 Declaration of Dr. Jaime Wong in Support of Intuitive Surgical, Inc.’s Administrative Motion to Seal Materials from its Summary Judgment Reply (“Wong Dec.”), Wong Dec. ¶ 4. GRANTED. Cybersecurity development content. 18 ECF No. 186 Intuitive’s Administrative Motion to Seal Materials From its Summary Judgment Reply, pg. 1-2 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2024 26 27 ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN United States District Judge 28 21

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?