Dorian v. Kijakazi

Filing 30

Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 28 motion to extend time. Defendant's cross-motion and statement of the record are due August 1, 2022. Plaintiff's reply and response to the statement of the record are due August 15, 2022. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 B.D., 7 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 28 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 10 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 21-cv-04493-JCS Plaintiff, Defendant Kilolo Kijakazi (the “Commissioner”) moves for a three-day extension of time 12 13 to file her cross motion and separate statement, continuing the deadline from July 29, 2022 to 14 August 1, 2022. Dkt. 28. Although the Court previously stated that no further extensions would 15 be granted, see dkt. 26, defense counsel has shown exigent circumstances requiring this short 16 further continuance. The unopposed motion1 is therefore GRANTED, and the Commissioner’s 17 motion and statement of the record are due August 1, 2022. The Court notes that the 18 Commissioner has now filed her motion (dkt. 29) but has not yet filed her statement of the record. 19 The deadline for Plaintiff’s reply brief and response to the Commissioner’s statement of 20 the record (if needed, see dkt. 11) is CONTINUED to August 15, 2022 and will not be extended 21 further unless similar exigent circumstances arise. IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 Dated: August 1, 2022 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 Counsel is once again reminded that under this Court’s local rules, an unopposed request for an extension of time should be filed as a stipulation rather than as a motion. See dkt. 14 (citing Civ. L.R. 6-2, 6-3(a)(2)).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?