Synopsys, Inc. v. Dolphin Technology, Inc.

Filing 47

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/15/2022. (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DENISE M. MINGRONE (SBN 135224) dmingrone@orrick.com JONATHAN J LIU (SBN 328955) jonathanliu@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025-1015 Telephone: +1 650 614 7400 Facsimile: +1 650 614 7401 ERIN M. B. LEACH (SBN 308347) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 2050 Main Street, Suite 1100 Irvine, CA 92614-8255 Telephone: +1 949 567 6700 Facsimile: +1 949 567 6710 Attorneys for Plaintiff, SYNOPSYS, INC. 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 SYNOPSYS, INC., 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:21-cv-06207-EMC [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF CASE WITH PREJUDICE DOLPHIN TECHNOLOGY, INC., and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL - CASE 3:21-CV-06207-EMC 1 WHEREAS Plaintiff Synopsys, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Dolphin Technology, 2 Inc., (“Defendant”) are parties to a civil action entitled Synopsys, Inc. v. Dolphin Technology, 3 Inc., et al., in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. 4 3:21-cv-06207-EMC (the “Litigation”); 5 6 WHEREAS Plaintiff has alleged that the Defendant violated the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”), and Copyright Act and Defendant denies these allegations; and 7 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in consideration of the 8 payments, promises and mutual undertakings set forth herein and in the Parties’ Confidential 9 Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) executed by Plaintiff and Defendant and incorporated 10 herein by this reference, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Court orders as 11 follows. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 1. Defendant, including Dolphin Technology Vietnam, and its representatives, officers, agents, directors, affiliates, servants, employees, contractors, and consultants and all persons acting in concert or participation with it agree they have ceased accessing any Synopsys applications or any electronic files associated with the use of or access to any Synopsys applications, including but not limited to counterfeit license key files, without a valid license issued from Synopsys. Defendant, including Dolphin Technology Vietnam, and its representatives, officers, agents, directors, affiliates, servants, employees, consultants and all persons acting in concert or participation with it including employees and independent contractors, agree that they are permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly accessing, using, transferring, or copying, in any way, any Synopsys software without authorization from Synopsys and they may use or access Synopsys applications only with a valid license issued by Synopsys and only in the quantity specified by those licenses. 2. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce the terms of the Agreement without the necessity of any party’s filing a separate lawsuit to do so. In any contest over an alleged violation of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. 24 3. All claims filed herein are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs, except as specified in the Parties’ Confidential Settlement Agreement. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 26 27 August 15, 2022 Dated: _____________________ HONORABLE EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 28 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 4129-7842-1052 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL – CASE 3:21-CV-06207-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?