Reichert v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
71
ORDER RE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT. A fairness hearing is set for January 18, 2024, at 10:00 a.m., in San Francisco Courtroom 11, 19th Floor. Signed by Judge James Donato on 9/15/2023. (jdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/15/2023)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRIAN REICHERT, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
JUNIPER NETWORKS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER RE PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT
v.
9
10
Case No. 21-cv-06213-JD
12
13
This litigation arose out of claims of alleged breaches of fiduciary duties in violation of the
14
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), asserted against Defendants
15
Juniper Networks, Inc., the Board of Directors of the Juniper Networks, Inc., and the Investment
16
Committee of Juniper Networks, Inc. (“Defendants”), relating to the management of the Juniper
17
Networks, Inc. 401(k) Plan (“Juniper Plan”). Dkt. No. 1.
18
The Court denied without prejudice a prior application for preliminary approval of a class
19
settlement. Dkt. No. 65. The parties filed a revised application, Dkt. No. 66, which addressed the
20
Court’s concerns. This is order is based a proposed order lodged by the parties and modified
21
according to the Court’s practices and conclusions. Counsel are advised that some dates and
22
deadlines have been changed. Unless stated otherwise, capitalized terms take the meaning stated
23
in the Class Action Settlement Agreement dated November 7, 2022, and attached as Exhibit A to
24
the Declaration of Paul Secunda. Dkt. No. 66-4.
25
1.
The proposed Settlement resulted from arm’s-length negotiations by experienced
26
and competent counsel. The Settlement was negotiated after Class Counsel had received pertinent
27
information and documents from Defendants. Class Counsel and the Class Representatives have
28
submitted declarations in support of the Settlement.
1
The Court finds that the Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to
2
warrant sending notice of the Settlement to the Settlement Class. A hearing is set for January 18,
3
2024, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 11 of the United States District Court for the Northern District
4
of California, 19th floor, on these issues:
5
a. Whether the Court should approve the Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate;
6
b. Whether the Court should enter the Final Approval Order, and
7
c. Whether the Court should approve any motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs,
8
9
United States District Court
Northern District of California
2.
Administrative Expenses, and Class Representative Compensation.
3.
The Court approves and orders that Analytics Consulting LLC shall be the
10
Settlement Administrator responsible for carrying out the responsibilities set forth in the
11
Settlement Agreement, with fees and costs not to exceed $50,000.00. The Settlement
12
Administrator will be bound by the Confidentiality Order and any further non-disclosure or
13
security protocol jointly required by the Settling Parties, set forth in writing to the Settlement
14
Administrator. The Settlement Administrator will use the data provided by Defendants and the
15
Plan’s recordkeeper solely for the purpose of meeting its obligations as Settlement Administrator,
16
and for no other purpose. The Settling Parties shall have the right to approve a written protocol to
17
be provided by the Settlement Administrator concerning how the Settlement Administrator will
18
maintain, store, and dispose of information provided to it in order to ensure that reasonable and
19
necessary precautions are taken to safeguard the privacy and security of such information pursuant
20
to the Settlement Administration Data Protection Checklist of the Northern District of California.
21
4.
The following Settlement Class is preliminarily certified for settlement purposes
22
only pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(1): All participants and beneficiaries of the Juniper
23
Networks, Inc. 401(k) Plan beginning August 11, 2015, and running through the date of
24
preliminary approval of the settlement. The Court appoints Brian Reichert and Derek Deviny as
25
representatives for the Settlement Class. Further, the Court appoints Walcheske & Luzi, LLC as
26
counsel for the Settlement Class.
27
28
5.
The Settling Parties have presented to the Court the Settlement Notice, which is the
proposed forms of notice regarding the Settlement for mailing to Class Members.
2
1
2
forms and content therein fairly and adequately:
3
i. Summarize the claims asserted;
4
ii. Describe the terms and effect of the Settlement;
5
iii. Notify the Settlement Class that Class Counsel will seek compensation from
6
the Settlement Fund for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Administrative
7
Expenses, the Independent Fiduciary’s fees, and Case Contribution Awards;
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
a. The Court approves the text of the Settlement Notice and finds that the proposed
iv. Give notice to the Settlement Class of the time and place of the Fairness
Hearing, and Class Members’ right to appear; and
v. Describe how the recipients of the Class Notice may object to the
11
Settlement, or any requested Attorneys’ Fees and Costs, Administrative
12
Expenses, the Independent Fiduciary’s fees, or Case Contribution Awards.
13
b. Pursuant to Rules 23(c)(2) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
14
contents of the Settlement Notice and mailing the Settlement Notices constitutes the best notice
15
practicable under the circumstances, provides due and sufficient notice of the Fairness Hearing
16
and of the rights of all Class Members, and complies fully with the requirements of Federal Rule
17
of Civil Procedure 23 and due process.
18
c. The Settlement Administrator will send by first-class mail the appropriate
19
Settlement Notice to each Class Member within seventy-five (75) calendar days of the date of this
20
Order, as specified in the Settlement Agreement, based on data provided by the Plan’s
21
recordkeeper. The Settlement Notices will be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to the
22
last known address of each Class Member provided by the Plan’s recordkeeper (or its designee),
23
unless an updated address is obtained by the Settlement Administrator through its efforts to verify
24
the last known addresses provided by the Plan’s recordkeeper (or its designee). The Settlement
25
Administrator will use commercially reasonable efforts to locate any Class Member whose
26
Settlement Notice is returned and re-mail such documents one additional time.
27
28
d. On or before the date that Settlement Notices are sent to the Settlement Class, the
Settlement Administrator will establish a Settlement Website and telephone support line as
3
1
provided by the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Administrator will post a copy of the
2
Settlement Notices on the Settlement Website.
3
Class Counsel and Local Counsel will file a request for attorneys’ fees and costs,
4
settlement administrative expenses, and case contribution awards, sixty (60) days before the
5
Fairness Hearing.
6
7.
Objections to any aspect of the Settlement will be heard by the Court at the
7
Fairness Hearing if they have been timely sent to Class Counsel and Defendants’ Counsel. To be
8
timely, the objection and any supporting documents must be sent to Class Counsel and
9
Defendants’ Counsel at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the Fairness Hearing.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
6.
8.
A party may file a response to an objection by a Class Member at least fourteen
11
(14) calendar days before the Fairness Hearing, and Plaintiffs shall file their Final Approval
12
Motion at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the Fairness Hearing.
13
9.
The Court may adjourn, modify, or continue the Fairness Hearing without further
14
direct notice to the Class Members, other than by notice via the Court’s docket or the Settlement
15
Website.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 15, 2023
18
19
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?