(HC) Valenzuela v. Cates

Filing 9

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/7/2022. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-08129-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JACOB VALENZUELA, AM1139, Petitioner, 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 21-cv-08129-CRB (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. B. CATES, Warden, Respondent. This habeas corpus action by a prisoner was filed in the Eastern District of California on 12 October 4, 2021 and transferred to this court on October 6, 2021. On October 18, 2021, this court 13 notified petitioner in writing that the action was deficient because petitioner did not pay the 14 requisite $5.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma 15 pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner’s account and a 16 copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement for the last six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). 17 Petitioner was advised that failure to file the requested items within 28 days would result in 18 dismissal of the action. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Because the mailing of the October 18, 2021 notice did not include petitioner’s CDCR number (AM1139), the court remailed the notice on October 22, 2021 again advising petitioner that failure to file the requested items within 28 days would result in dismissal of the action. More than 60 days have elapsed; however, petitioner has not provided the court with the requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so. The action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk is instructed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2022 ______________________________________ CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?