(HC) Valenzuela v. Cates
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/7/2022. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 3:21-cv-08129-CRB Document 9 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JACOB VALENZUELA, AM1139,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 21-cv-08129-CRB (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
B. CATES, Warden,
This habeas corpus action by a prisoner was filed in the Eastern District of California on
October 4, 2021 and transferred to this court on October 6, 2021. On October 18, 2021, this court
notified petitioner in writing that the action was deficient because petitioner did not pay the
requisite $5.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma
pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner’s account and a
copy of the prisoner’s trust account statement for the last six months. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
Petitioner was advised that failure to file the requested items within 28 days would result in
dismissal of the action.
Because the mailing of the October 18, 2021 notice did not include petitioner’s CDCR
number (AM1139), the court remailed the notice on October 22, 2021 again advising petitioner
that failure to file the requested items within 28 days would result in dismissal of the action.
More than 60 days have elapsed; however, petitioner has not provided the court with the
requisite items or sought an extension of time to do so. The action is DISMISSED without
prejudice. The clerk is instructed to close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 7, 2022
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?