HD Silicon Solutions LLC v. Microchip Technology Inc.

Filing 152

Order by Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim Denying 123 Motion to Strike ; Denying 140 Motion to Strike ; and Requiring Meeting and Conferring to Amend Case Schedule.(sklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HD SILICON SOLUTIONS LLC, Plaintiff, 8 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC., Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 ORDER REGARDING PROPOSING AN AMENDED CASE SCHEDULE v. 9 10 Case No. 21-cv-08295-SK Regarding Docket Nos. 123, 140 As the Court discussed at the hearing on May 13, 2024, the Court DENIES both parties’ 13 motions to strike the other parties’ experts. In light of the Court extending the schedule for the 14 entire case, the Court will allow both parties time to depose the other parties’ experts, thus 15 alleviating any prejudice from the inadequate disclosures. The parties shall meet and confer and 16 propose a deadline to depose the expert witnesses. In addition, as discussed, the parties shall meet 17 and confer to propose new deadlines for the following: 18 1. Tutorial 19 2. Hearing on pending motion for judgment on the pleadings 20 3. Hearing on pending motion to strike amended infringement contentions at least two 21 weeks after the hearing on the motion for judgment on the pleadings. The parties 22 are advised the Court is tentatively inclined to allow Plaintiff HD Silicon Solutions 23 LLC (“HDSS”) to amend its infringement contentions. The proposed amended 24 schedule should include any changes to the schedule that would be requested if the 25 Court did deny the motion to strike. 26 4. Schedule for briefing on the claims construction which includes an opportunity for 27 Defendant Microchip Technology Inc. (“Microchip”) to file a revised opening 28 claim construction brief. 1 5. Hearing on the claims construction. 2 By no later than May 20, 2024, the parties shall meet and confer and shall file their 3 stipulated request, or competing proposals if they cannot agree, regarding the schedule for the 4 above matters. The Court will schedule a case management conference after resolving the claims 5 construction to address whether the remaining case schedule needs to be adjusted as well. 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 13, 2024 ______________________________________ SALLIE KIM United States Magistrate Judge 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?