Vogelgesang v. Life Insurance Company of North America
Filing
15
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/7/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2022)
1 Nicole Y. Blohm (Bar No. 177284)
nblohm@mmhllp.com
2 Grant E. Ingram (Bar No. 242785)
gingram@mmhllp.com
3 MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1860
4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2457
Telephone: (213) 620-0300
5 Facsimile: (213) 625-1930
6 Attorneys for Defendant
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 BRIAN VOGELGESANG,
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH
AMERICA,
15
Defendant.
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:21-cv-08510-WHO
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE; AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER]
Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick
Complaint Filed: November 2, 2021
17
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff BRIAN VOGELGESANG and
18
19 Defendant LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, by and through their attorneys
20 of record, that this action shall be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice as to all defendants pursuant
21 to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees
22 and costs.
The Parties further stipulate and request that all dates set in this matter be vacated and taken
23
24 off the Court’s calendar.
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
LAW OFFICES
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
1
177952.1
Case No. 3:21-cv-08510-WHO
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
The Parties seek the Court’s approval of the dismissal of the action with prejudice.
2
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
3
4
Dated: January 7, 2022
Michelle L. Roberts
ROBERTS DISABILITY LAW
5
By:
6
/s/ Michelle L. Roberts
Michelle L. Roberts
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BRIAN VOGELGESANG
7
8
9 Dated: January 7, 2022
10
Nicole Y. Blohm
Grant E. Ingram
MESERVE, MUMPER & HUGHES LLP
11
12
By:
/s/ Grant E. Ingram
Grant E. Ingram
Attorneys for Defendant
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF
NORTH AMERICA
13
14
15
16
FILER’S ATTESTATION
17
The filing attorney attests that he has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this
18
19
document and its content from the signatories to this document.
20
21
22
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON NEXT PAGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
2
177952.1
Case No. 3:21-cv-08510-WHO
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
***ORDER***
1
2
Based upon the Stipulation of the Parties and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY
3 ORDERED that this action, Case No. 3:21-cv-08510-WHO, is dismissed in its entirety as to all
4 defendants with prejudice.
5
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that all dates previously set in this matter are hereby
6 vacated and taken off the Court’s calendar.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that each Party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and
7
8 costs in this matter.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12 Dated: January 7, 2022
Hon. William H. Orrick
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAW OFFICES
MESERVE,
MUMPER &
HUGHES LLP
1
177952.1
Case No. 3:21-cv-08510-WHO
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?