Blockchain Innovation, LLC v. Franklin Resources, Inc. et al
Filing
213
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson denying 198 Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2024)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BLOCKCHAIN INNOVATION, LLC,
8
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
Case No. 21-cv-08787-AMO (TSH)
ORDER RE MOTION TO SEAL
v.
Re: Dkt. No. 198
10
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC., et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
In ECF No. 198, Plaintiff filed a motion to consider whether another party’s materials
14
should be sealed, specifically, Exhibits C and D to the discovery letter brief, which are excerpts of
15
Roger Bayston’s deposition. In ECF No. 204, Defendants state that they do not seek to seal any of
16
the excerpts identified in Plaintiff’s motion to seal. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED,
17
and the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to file Exhibits C and D in the public record.
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: May 8, 2024
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?