Warren v. Guerrero et al

Filing 34

ORDER declining to resolve whether cases that have been voluntarily dismissed are related. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on January 11, 2021. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)Copy placed in O:drive on 1/11/2022. Modified on 1/11/2022 (klh, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-09427-JCS Document 34 Filed 01/11/22 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CAMERON WARREN, Plaintiff, 5 6 7 8 9 10 Case Nos. 21-cv-09427-JCS, et al. v. QUENDRY GUERRERO, et al., ORDER REGARDING REFERRALS TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES ARE RELATED Defendants; and potentially related cases. Plaintiff Cameron Warren, pro se, filed thirty-nine complaints in this Court in the month of United States District Court Northern District of California 11 December bringing similar claims against different defendants. The undersigned previously 12 determined that four of those cases were related to this first case, and that one case (which had 13 already been reassigned to a district judge for lack of consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction) was 14 not related. Warren has now voluntarily dismissed all of his cases except the one the undersigned 15 determined was not related. 16 The undersigned finds that all pending referrals to consider whether Warren’s since- 17 dismissed cases are related to any other case are moot, and declines to resolve them on that basis. 18 This order is without prejudice to any future referral or motion to consider whether cases are 19 related in the event that future filings in any of these cases would require court action. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 11, 2022 ______________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPERO Chief Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?