Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. et al v. Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC
Filing
44
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 43 to Continue Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for May 26, 2022 is continued to July 28, 2022 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by July 21, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/10/2022. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022)
1
2
3
4
5
Morgan E. Smith (SBN 293503)
morgan.smith@finnegan.com
Matthew Samet (SBN 311865)
matthew.samet@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 849-6600
Facsimile:
(650) 849-6666
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
B. Brett Heavner (pro hac vice)
b.brett.heavner@finnegan.com
Jonathan Uffelman (pro hac vice)
Jonathan.uffelman@finnegan.com
Yinfei Wu (pro hac vice)
Yinfei.wu@finnegan.com
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: (202) 408-4000
Facsimile:
(202) 408-4400
Elizabeth G. Borland (pro hac vice)
eborland@sgrlaw.com
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
1105 W. Peachtree Street, #1000
Atlanta, GA 30309
Tel. 404-815-3645
Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941)
grapoport@sgrlaw.com
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
444 South Flower Street, Ste. 1700
Los Angeles, CA 90071-2901
Tel. 213-358-7220; Fax 213-358-7320
Richard D. Rivera (pro hac vice)
rrivera@sgrlaw.com
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
500 N. Laura Street, Suite 2600
Jacksonville, FL 32202
Tel. 904-598-6157
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies
Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
19
SHENZHEN BIG MOUTH TECHNOLOGIES
CO., LTD. and DECAI (TONY) FU,
20
Plaintiffs, and
Counterclaim Defendants,
21
22
23
24
CASE NO. 3:21-cv-09545-RS
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; ORDER
v.
FACTORY DIRECT WHOLESALE, LLC,
Defendant and
Counterclaim Plaintiff.
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER
CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS
1
JOINT STIPULATION
2
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2022, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big
3
Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for
4
judgment on the pleadings as to Count I of Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Non-Violation of the Anti-
5
Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (the
6
“Motion”), and scheduled the hearing for June 16, 2022.
7
8
9
WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is set for May 26, 2022, before the hearing on the
Motion.
WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Direct Wholesale,
10
LLC (“Defendant”) are currently engaged in settlement discussions regarding the Plaintiff’s
11
Complaint and Defendant’s Amended Answer and Counterclaims.
12
WHEREAS, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree that because certain pleadings
13
may be dismissed or amended following the hearing on the Motion on June 16, 2022, and the parties
14
are currently engaged in settlement discussions, (1) the Case Management Conference should be
15
continued by at least thirty (30) days after the Court’s ruling on the Motion and (2) the associated
16
deadlines to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures should be continued
17
to seven (7) days before the continued Case Management Conference.
18
THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate:
19
1.
20
21
22
The Case Management Conference is continued to at least thirty (30) days after the
Court’s ruling on the Motion; and
2.
The deadline to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures is
continued to seven (7) days before the continued Case Management Conference.
23
24
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: May 10, 2022
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
25
By:
26
27
/s/ Matthew Samet
Matthew Samet
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co.,
Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu
28
1
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER
CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS
1
Dated: May 10, 2022
SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP
2
By:
3
4
/s/ Gregg A. Rapoport
Gregg A. Rapoport
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER
CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS
1
ATTESTATION
2
Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co.,
3
Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in the filing of this
4
document was obtained from counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Direct
5
Wholesale, LLC.
6
7
Dated: May 10, 2022
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
8
9
10
11
By:
/s/ Matthew Samet
Matthew Samet
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim
Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co.,
Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ORDER
CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS
1
ORDER
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that:
3
1.
July 28,
The Case Management Conference is continued to _________________, 2022.
4
2.
The deadlines to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures
5
July 21
are continued to ______________, 2022.
6
7
Dated: _____________________
May 10, 2022
___________________________
Hon. Richard Seeborg
Chief U.S. District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?