Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. et al v. Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC

Filing 44

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 43 to Continue Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for May 26, 2022 is continued to July 28, 2022 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. Case Management Statement due by July 21, 2022. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/10/2022. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Morgan E. Smith (SBN 293503) morgan.smith@finnegan.com Matthew Samet (SBN 311865) matthew.samet@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3300 Hillview Avenue Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-6600 Facsimile: (650) 849-6666 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 B. Brett Heavner (pro hac vice) b.brett.heavner@finnegan.com Jonathan Uffelman (pro hac vice) Jonathan.uffelman@finnegan.com Yinfei Wu (pro hac vice) Yinfei.wu@finnegan.com FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 901 New York Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 408-4000 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Elizabeth G. Borland (pro hac vice) eborland@sgrlaw.com SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP 1105 W. Peachtree Street, #1000 Atlanta, GA 30309 Tel. 404-815-3645 Gregg A. Rapoport (SBN 136941) grapoport@sgrlaw.com SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP 444 South Flower Street, Ste. 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90071-2901 Tel. 213-358-7220; Fax 213-358-7320 Richard D. Rivera (pro hac vice) rrivera@sgrlaw.com SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP 500 N. Laura Street, Suite 2600 Jacksonville, FL 32202 Tel. 904-598-6157 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 19 SHENZHEN BIG MOUTH TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. and DECAI (TONY) FU, 20 Plaintiffs, and Counterclaim Defendants, 21 22 23 24 CASE NO. 3:21-cv-09545-RS JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER v. FACTORY DIRECT WHOLESALE, LLC, Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS 1 JOINT STIPULATION 2 WHEREAS, on April 28, 2022, Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big 3 Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu (together, “Plaintiffs”) filed a motion for 4 judgment on the pleadings as to Count I of Plaintiffs’ Complaint (Non-Violation of the Anti- 5 Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c) (the 6 “Motion”), and scheduled the hearing for June 16, 2022. 7 8 9 WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is set for May 26, 2022, before the hearing on the Motion. WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Direct Wholesale, 10 LLC (“Defendant”) are currently engaged in settlement discussions regarding the Plaintiff’s 11 Complaint and Defendant’s Amended Answer and Counterclaims. 12 WHEREAS, subject to the Court’s approval, the parties agree that because certain pleadings 13 may be dismissed or amended following the hearing on the Motion on June 16, 2022, and the parties 14 are currently engaged in settlement discussions, (1) the Case Management Conference should be 15 continued by at least thirty (30) days after the Court’s ruling on the Motion and (2) the associated 16 deadlines to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures should be continued 17 to seven (7) days before the continued Case Management Conference. 18 THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate: 19 1. 20 21 22 The Case Management Conference is continued to at least thirty (30) days after the Court’s ruling on the Motion; and 2. The deadline to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures is continued to seven (7) days before the continued Case Management Conference. 23 24 Respectfully submitted, Dated: May 10, 2022 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 25 By: 26 27 /s/ Matthew Samet Matthew Samet Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu 28 1 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS 1 Dated: May 10, 2022 SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP 2 By: 3 4 /s/ Gregg A. Rapoport Gregg A. Rapoport Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS 1 ATTESTATION 2 Counsel for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., 3 Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu hereby attests by his signature below that concurrence in the filing of this 4 document was obtained from counsel for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Direct 5 Wholesale, LLC. 6 7 Dated: May 10, 2022 FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 8 9 10 11 By: /s/ Matthew Samet Matthew Samet Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterclaim Defendants Shenzhen Big Mouth Technologies Co., Ltd. and Decai (Tony) Fu 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS 1 ORDER 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that: 3 1. July 28, The Case Management Conference is continued to _________________, 2022. 4 2. The deadlines to file a joint case management statement and serve initial disclosures 5 July 21 are continued to ______________, 2022. 6 7 Dated: _____________________ May 10, 2022 ___________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg Chief U.S. District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-CV-09545-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?