Young v. Valenzuela
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/17/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
Case 3:22-cv-02350-WHO Document 7 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KENRY LEE YOUNG,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 22-cv-02350-WHO
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff Kenry Lee Young’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. (Dkt.
No. 4.) When Young failed timely to file an amended complaint, the Court sua sponte
granted an extension but cautioned that failure to meet the extended deadline would result
in dismissal of this action. (Dkt. No. 6.) There was no response to the extension Order.
Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for
failing to comply with the Order and for failing to prosecute. See Federal Rule of Civil
Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any
such motion must contain an amended complaint (on this Court’s form) that complies in all
respects with the order dismissing the original complaint with leave to amend. The words
MOTION TO REOPEN must appear on the first page.
The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 17, 2022
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?