Young v. Valenzuela

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/17/2022. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
Case 3:22-cv-02350-WHO Document 7 Filed 11/17/22 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KENRY LEE YOUNG, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 22-cv-02350-WHO ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. E. VALENZUELA, Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Kenry Lee Young’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. (Dkt. 14 No. 4.) When Young failed timely to file an amended complaint, the Court sua sponte 15 granted an extension but cautioned that failure to meet the extended deadline would result 16 in dismissal of this action. (Dkt. No. 6.) There was no response to the extension Order. 17 Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for 18 failing to comply with the Order and for failing to prosecute. See Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 41(b). 20 Because this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen. Any 21 such motion must contain an amended complaint (on this Court’s form) that complies in all 22 respects with the order dismissing the original complaint with leave to amend. The words 23 MOTION TO REOPEN must appear on the first page. 24 The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendant, and close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: November 17, 2022 27 28 _________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?