CNC Software, LLC v. Global Engineering Limited Liability Company et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting in part and denying in part 13 Ex Parte Application. The Court DENIES CNC's motion for service by email. However, the Court GRANTS its request for an extension of time to complete service and EXTENDS the deadline to September 9, 2022. Given this extension, the Court CONTINUES the case management conference to October 27, 2022. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2022)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CNC SOFTWARE, LLC,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

Case No. 22-cv-02488-TSH

v.
GLOBAL ENGINEERING LIMITED
LIABILITY COMPANY, et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.

Re: Dkt. No. 13

12
13
14

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE
APPLICATION TO AUTHORIZE
SERVICE BY EMAIL AND GRANTING
APPLICATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR SERVICE

I.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff CNC Software, LLC seeks leave to serve Defendant Robert Avila by email and to

15

extend the time to complete service. ECF No. 13. No opposition has been received. The Court

16

finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument under Civil Local Rule 7-1(b).

17

Having considered CNC’s position and the relevant legal authority, the Court DENIES CNC’s

18

motion for service by email and GRANTS its request for an extension of time to complete service

19

for the following reasons.

20
21

II.

BACKGROUND

CNC filed this copyright infringement case on April 22, 2022, against Defendants Global

22

Engineering, LLC, Robert Avila (Manager of Global Engineering), and Edwin Escobar (President

23

of Global Engineering). Compl. ¶¶ 2, 4-5, ECF No. 1. Global Engineering is located at 3233 De

24

La Cruz Boulevard, Suite C, Santa Clara, California 95054. Id. ¶ 2. According to CNC, Avila is

25

the registered agent for numerous companies, including 5-Stars Engineering Associates, which

26

was dissolved on December 30, 2019. Id. ¶ 3. CNC alleges that 5-Star now operates as Global

27

Engineering. Id. CNC also alleges that Avila uses 1111 Morse Avenue, Suite 77, Sunnyvale, CA

28

94089 as an address for service of process. Id. ¶¶ 3-4; Trice Decl. ¶ 4, ECF No. 13-1.

1

On May 19 CNC’s counsel hired Bayside Process Services, LLC to serve the complaint on

2

Defendants at 3233 De la Cruz Boulevard. Trice Decl. ¶ 3. According to CNC, Bayside’s process

3

server, Jose Mendoza, successfully served Global Engineering and Escobar, but Global

4

Engineering’s receptionist informed him that Avila was not at this address. Id. Mendoza also

5

made “numerous attempts” to serve Avila at 1111 Morse Avenue. Id. ¶ 4. However, “although an

6

individual was at the residence, they did not answer the door.” Id.

7
8

office address for Avila: 1650 Zanker Road, Suite 230, San Jose, CA 95112. Id. ¶ 5. Although

9

Mendoza made at least 10 attempts to serve Avila at this address at various times of the day, he

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

On June 15 CNC’s counsel performed a Lexis and internet search and located an additional

was unsuccessful and further reports that the office is closed. Id. ¶ 6.

11

On July 13 CNC’s counsel called Avila at 408-242-7166 and asked for his email address,

12

which is [e-mail]. Id. ¶ 7. Avila advised that he was going on vacation and would be

13

unavailable for about a week. Id. On July 20 CNC’s counsel emailed a copy of the service

14

documents to [e-mail], and the email did not bounce back as undeliverable. Id. ¶ 8.

15
16
17
18

CNC now seeks leave to serve Avila by email “because he is avoiding service.” Mot. at 3.
CNC also seeks an extension of time to complete service.
III.

LEGAL STANDARD

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e), a plaintiff may serve an individual defendant

19

using any method permitted by the law of the state in which the district court is located or in

20

which service is effected. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(e)(1). California law allows for five basic methods of

21

service: (1) personal delivery to the party, see Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 415.10; (2) delivery to

22

someone else at the party’s usual residence or place of business with mailing after (known as

23

“substitute service”), see id. § 415.20; (3) service by mail with acknowledgment of receipt, see id.

24

§ 415.30; (4) service on persons outside the state by certified or registered mail with a return

25

receipt requested, see id. § 415.40; and (5) service by publication, see id. § 415.50. California

26

Code of Civil Procedure § 413.30 also provides that a court “may direct that summons be served

27

in a manner which is reasonably calculated to give actual notice to the party served.” Courts in

28

this district have authorized service by email under California Civil Procedure Code § 413.30.
2

1

See, e.g., Steve McCurry Studios, LLC v. Web2Web Mktg., Inc., 2014 WL 1877547, at *2-3 (N.D.

2

Cal. May 9, 2014); United Health Services, Inc. v. Meyer, 2013 WL 843698, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Mar.

3

6, 2013); Facebook, Inc. v. Banana Ads, LLC, 2012 WL 1038752, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 27,

4

2012).

5

United States District Court
Northern District of California

6

IV.

DISCUSSION

While CNC has offered evidence that is has made numerous attempts to serve Avila with

7

reasonable diligence, the Court finds it has failed to establish good cause to permit service by

8

email at this time. While CNC argues Avila is “purposely evading service of process,” it also

9

states that its counsel spoke with Avila on July 13, at which time Avila apparently provided his

10

email address. Trice Decl. ¶ 7. This shows that CNC has been able to communicate with Avila on

11

at least one occasion, yet there is no indication it attempted to confirm his address for service or

12

determine if he would waive service. Compare Steve McCurry Studios, LLC, 2014 WL 1877547,

13

at *2 (N.D. Cal. May 9, 2014) (finding good cause to permit service by email because plaintiff’s

14

counsel emailed the defendant, asking for an updated address as well as a convenient time and

15

place for the process server to meet him for the service of the subpoenas, but no response had been

16

received). Further, when he spoke with CNC’s counsel, Avila stated he would be on vacation for

17

one week, yet CNC chose to file the present motion during that time. It is unclear why CNC did

18

not attempt to confirm Avila’s service address and seek leave to extend the deadline to serve him

19

at that address after he returned. Finally, while CNC states it successfully served Global

20

Engineering and Escobar, the Clerk of Court recently declined to enter default against those

21

defendants because (1) the agent on the proof of service does not match the agent of service listed

22

on the California Secretary of State website and (2) the proofs of service include two different

23

dates service was completed. See ECF Nos. 14-15. As it is unclear if any of the named

24

defendants have been properly served, there appears to be no urgency that requires service by

25

email. Accordingly, the Court finds good cause does not exist to permit service by email.

26
27
28

V.

CONCLUSION

For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES CNC’s motion for service by email.
However, the Court GRANTS its request for an extension of time to complete service and
3

1

EXTENDS the deadline to September 9, 2022. Given this extension, the Court CONTINUES the

2

case management conference, currently scheduled for August 4, to October 27, 2022 at 10:00 a.m.

3

by Zoom video conference. The webinar link and instructions are located at

4

https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/hixson-thomas-s-tsh/. The parties shall file a joint case

5

management statement by October 20, 2022.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated: August 2, 2022

9
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4