In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation

Filing 898

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 897 for Relief from Deadline in Order, Dkt. No. 850 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/12/2025. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2025)

Download PDF
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes, Admitted Pro Hac Vice Email: jaybarnes@simmonsfirm.com SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC 112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 784-6400 Facsimile: (212) 213-5949 Geoffrey Graber, CSB #211547 Email: ggraber@cohenmilstein.com COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC 1100 New York Avenue NW, Fifth Floor Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 408-4600 Facsimile: (202) 408-4699 Jeffrey A. Koncius, CSB #189803 Email: koncius@kiesel.law KIESEL LAW LLP 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, California 90211 Telephone: (310) 854-4444 Facsimile: (310) 854-0812 Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181 Email: bterrell@terrellmarshall.com TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC 936 North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, Washington 98103 Telephone: (206) 816-6603 Facsimile: (206) 319-5450 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class 12 [Additional counsel listed on signature page] Andre M. Mura, CSB #298541 Email: amm@classlawgroup.com GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, California 94607 Telephone: (510) 350-9700 Facsimile: (510) 350-9701 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 17 18 IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE 19 LITIGATION 20 This Document Relates to: 21 22 23 24 All Actions. Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD) ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 CLASS ACTION The Honorable Virginia K. DeMarchi Re: Dkt. No. 897 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 1 Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD) 1 STIPULATED MOTION 2 On January 15, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to serve their 30(b)(6) deposition notice 3 by the following week and that “[t]he parties shall promptly confer regarding disagreements 4 regarding the topics in Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice.” Dkt. 772. 5 Plaintiffs served their 30(b)(6) deposition notices on January 20, 2025 and January 24, 6 2025. 7 On February 18, 2025, the Court ordered that “[a]ny dispute about plaintiffs’ Rule 8 30(b)(6) deposition notice to Meta must be submitted for resolution no later than March 11, 9 2025.” Dkt. 850. 10 On February 12 and February 14, 2025, the parties informally discussed some of Meta’s 11 concerns as to the 30(b)(6) notices. 12 Meta served objections to Plaintiffs’ 30(b)(6) notices on March 10, 2025. 13 In order to ensure that the parties are able to fully discuss their disputes before seeking 14 relief from the Court, while at the same time recognizing the goals of Dkt. 850 to prevent delay, 15 the parties jointly move pursuant to Rule 26 and the Court’s inherent power to control the case 16 schedule that the Court enter the following order: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The deadline for the parties to submit any disputes about Plaintiffs’ Notices of 30(b)(6) deposition shall be extended to March 20, 2025. 2. At least one member of each party’s lead counsel team must attend a final meet-andconfer concerning Meta’s 30(b)(6) objections by March 14, 2025. 3. Plaintiffs must send Meta any draft joint letter briefs on any 30(b)(6) issues remaining after this conference by March 17, 2025. 4. Meta must return its response(s) to Plaintiffs by March 19, 2025 for filing on March 20, 2025. 5. If either party fails to meet any of these deadlines, the other party may file a unilateral motion for appropriate relief as to the 30(b)(6) deposition. 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 2 Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD) 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION The CM/ECF user filing this paper attests that concurrence in its filing has been obtained 3 from its other signatories. 4 5 6 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this 11th day of March, 2025. By: /s/ Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes By: /s/ Lauren R. Goldman Lauren R. Goldman 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes (admitted pro hac vice) jaybarnes@simmonsfirm.com 112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: 212-784-6400 Fax: 212-213-5949 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Lauren R. Goldman (pro hac vice) lgoldman@gibsondunn.com Darcy C. Harris (pro hac vice) dharris@gibsondunn.com 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 Telephone: (212) 351-4000 COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL Facsimile: (212) 351-4035 PLLC Geoffrey Graber, State Bar No. 211547 Elizabeth K. McCloskey (SBN 268184) ggraber@cohenmilstein.com emccloskey@gibsondunn.com 1100 New York Avenue NW, Fifth Floor Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746) Washington, DC 20005 abarrera@gibsondunn.com Tel: 202-408-4600 One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600 Fax: 202-408-4699 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 393-8200 KIESEL LAW LLP Facsimile: (415) 393-8306 Jeffrey A. Koncius, State Bar No. 189803 koncius@kiesel.law 8648 Wilshire Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 90211 Tel: 310-854-4444 Fax: 310-854-0812 TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Beth E. Terrell, State Bar No. 178181 bterrell@terrellmarshall.com 936 North 34th Street, Suite 300 Seattle, WA 98103 Tel.: 206-816-6603 Fax: 206-319-5450 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 3 Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD) 1 2 3 4 5 GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP Andre M. Mura, State Bar No. 298541 amm@classlawgroup.com 1111 Broadway, Suite 2100 Oakland, CA 94607 Tel.: 510-350-9700 Fax: 510-350-9701 6 7 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: March 12, 2025 9 __________________________ ___ 10 Virginia K. DeMarchi 11 United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 4 Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?