In Re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation
Filing
898
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 897 for Relief from Deadline in Order, Dkt. No. 850 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Virginia K. DeMarchi on 3/12/2025. (vkdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2025)
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes, Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Email: jaybarnes@simmonsfirm.com
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: (212) 784-6400
Facsimile: (212) 213-5949
Geoffrey Graber, CSB #211547
Email: ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS
& TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Avenue NW, Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Facsimile: (202) 408-4699
Jeffrey A. Koncius, CSB #189803
Email: koncius@kiesel.law
KIESEL LAW LLP
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, California 90211
Telephone: (310) 854-4444
Facsimile: (310) 854-0812
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@terrellmarshall.com
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW
GROUP PLLC
936 North 34th Street, Suite 300
Seattle, Washington 98103
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 319-5450
11
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
12
[Additional counsel listed on signature page]
Andre M. Mura, CSB #298541
Email: amm@classlawgroup.com
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
1111 Broadway, Suite 2100
Oakland, California 94607
Telephone: (510) 350-9700
Facsimile: (510) 350-9701
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
IN RE META PIXEL HEALTHCARE
19 LITIGATION
20 This Document Relates to:
21
22
23
24
All Actions.
Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATED MOTION FOR
RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT.
850
CLASS ACTION
The Honorable Virginia K. DeMarchi
Re: Dkt. No. 897
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 1
Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)
1
STIPULATED MOTION
2
On January 15, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to serve their 30(b)(6) deposition notice
3 by the following week and that “[t]he parties shall promptly confer regarding disagreements
4 regarding the topics in Plaintiffs’ Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice.” Dkt. 772.
5
Plaintiffs served their 30(b)(6) deposition notices on January 20, 2025 and January 24,
6 2025.
7
On February 18, 2025, the Court ordered that “[a]ny dispute about plaintiffs’ Rule
8 30(b)(6) deposition notice to Meta must be submitted for resolution no later than March 11,
9 2025.” Dkt. 850.
10
On February 12 and February 14, 2025, the parties informally discussed some of Meta’s
11 concerns as to the 30(b)(6) notices.
12
Meta served objections to Plaintiffs’ 30(b)(6) notices on March 10, 2025.
13
In order to ensure that the parties are able to fully discuss their disputes before seeking
14 relief from the Court, while at the same time recognizing the goals of Dkt. 850 to prevent delay,
15 the parties jointly move pursuant to Rule 26 and the Court’s inherent power to control the case
16 schedule that the Court enter the following order:
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1. The deadline for the parties to submit any disputes about Plaintiffs’ Notices of
30(b)(6) deposition shall be extended to March 20, 2025.
2. At least one member of each party’s lead counsel team must attend a final meet-andconfer concerning Meta’s 30(b)(6) objections by March 14, 2025.
3. Plaintiffs must send Meta any draft joint letter briefs on any 30(b)(6) issues remaining
after this conference by March 17, 2025.
4. Meta must return its response(s) to Plaintiffs by March 19, 2025 for filing on March
20, 2025.
5. If either party fails to meet any of these deadlines, the other party may file a unilateral
motion for appropriate relief as to the 30(b)(6) deposition.
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 2
Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)
1
2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
The CM/ECF user filing this paper attests that concurrence in its filing has been obtained
3 from its other signatories.
4
5
6
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED AND DATED this 11th day of March, 2025.
By: /s/
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes
By: /s/
Lauren R. Goldman
Lauren R. Goldman
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class Attorneys for Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.
SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC
Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes (admitted pro hac vice)
jaybarnes@simmonsfirm.com
112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Tel: 212-784-6400
Fax: 212-213-5949
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
Lauren R. Goldman (pro hac vice)
lgoldman@gibsondunn.com
Darcy C. Harris (pro hac vice)
dharris@gibsondunn.com
200 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10166
Telephone:
(212) 351-4000
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL Facsimile:
(212) 351-4035
PLLC
Geoffrey Graber, State Bar No. 211547
Elizabeth K. McCloskey (SBN 268184)
ggraber@cohenmilstein.com
emccloskey@gibsondunn.com
1100 New York Avenue NW, Fifth Floor
Abigail A. Barrera (SBN 301746)
Washington, DC 20005
abarrera@gibsondunn.com
Tel: 202-408-4600
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
Fax: 202-408-4699
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 393-8200
KIESEL LAW LLP
Facsimile:
(415) 393-8306
Jeffrey A. Koncius, State Bar No. 189803
koncius@kiesel.law
8648 Wilshire Boulevard
Beverly Hills, CA 90211
Tel: 310-854-4444
Fax: 310-854-0812
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP
PLLC
Beth E. Terrell, State Bar No. 178181
bterrell@terrellmarshall.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 300
Seattle, WA 98103
Tel.: 206-816-6603
Fax: 206-319-5450
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 3
Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)
1
2
3
4
5
GIBBS LAW GROUP LLP
Andre M. Mura, State Bar No. 298541
amm@classlawgroup.com
1111 Broadway, Suite 2100
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel.: 510-350-9700
Fax:
510-350-9701
6
7
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
Dated: March 12, 2025
9
__________________________ ___
10
Virginia K. DeMarchi
11
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM DEADLINE IN DKT. 850 - 4
Case No. 3:22-cv-3580-WHO (VKD)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?