Richards v. Essick et al

Filing 14

ORDER. In the attached order, the court grants the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, directs the Clerk of Court to issue the summons for the Sonoma County defendants named in ECF No. 1, and directs the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California to serve those defendants. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division United States District Court Northern District of California 11 LARRY RICHARDS, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 22-cv-04652-LB ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION v. MARK ESSICK, et al., Defendants. 16 17 The plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court grants the application 18 and directs the Clerk of Court to issue the summons for the Sonoma County defendants named in 19 ECF No. 1. The court also directs the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California to serve, 20 without prepayment of fees, a copy of the summons and complaint, any amendments or 21 attachments, the plaintiff’s affidavit, the court’s longer order addressing the case issues, and this 22 order on those defendants. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 19, 2022 ______________________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28 ORDER – No. 22-cv-04652-LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?