Richards v. Essick et al
Filing
14
ORDER. In the attached order, the court grants the plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis, directs the Clerk of Court to issue the summons for the Sonoma County defendants named in ECF No. 1, and directs the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California to serve those defendants. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2022)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
San Francisco Division
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
LARRY RICHARDS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 22-cv-04652-LB
ORDER GRANTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS APPLICATION
v.
MARK ESSICK, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
The plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The court grants the application
18
and directs the Clerk of Court to issue the summons for the Sonoma County defendants named in
19
ECF No. 1. The court also directs the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California to serve,
20
without prepayment of fees, a copy of the summons and complaint, any amendments or
21
attachments, the plaintiff’s affidavit, the court’s longer order addressing the case issues, and this
22
order on those defendants.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: September 19, 2022
______________________________________
LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge
25
26
27
28
ORDER – No. 22-cv-04652-LB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?