Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al

Filing 106

ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Gass, Andrew) (Filed on 8/29/2023)

Download PDF
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 106 Filed 08/29/23 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE No C 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Sarah Andersen, et al. Plaintiff(s) v. ADR CERTIFICATION BY PARTIES AND COUNSEL Stability AI Ltd., et al. Defendant(s) Pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8(b) and ADR L.R. 3-5 (b), each of the undersigned certifies that he or she has: 1) Read the handbook entitled “Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedures Handbook” (available at cand.uscourts.gov/adr). 2) Discussed with each other the available dispute resolution options provided by the Court and private entities; and 3) Considered whether this case might benefit from any of the available dispute resolution options. Date: August 29, 2023 /s/ Moti Levy - CEO DeviantArt Date: August 29, 2023 Party /s/ Andrew M. Gass Attorney Counsel further certifies that he or she has discussed the selection of an ADR process with counsel for the other parties to the case. Based on that discussion, the parties: ˆ intend to stipulate to an ADR process ˆ prefer to discuss ADR selection with the Assigned Judge at the case management conference ■ Date: August 29, 2023 /s/ Andrew M. Gass Attorney Important! E-file this form in ECF using event name: “ADR Certification (ADR LR 3-5 b) of Discussion of ADR Options.” Form ADR-Cert rev. 1-15-2019 Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 106 Filed 08/29/23 Page 2 of 2 1 I, Andrew M. Gass, hereby attest that Monti Levy, CEO of DeviantArt, Inc., has provided 2 his concurrence with the electronic filing of the document entitled ADR CERTIFICATION BY 3 PARTIES AND COUNSEL. 4 5 Dated: August 29, 2023 /s/ Andrew M. Gass Andrew M. Gass 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 2 ADR CERTIFICATION CASE NO. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?