Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al

Filing 47

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midjourney, Inc. (Lauter, Judd) (Filed on 2/16/2023)

Download PDF
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 47 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 COOLEY LLP ANGELA L. DUNNING (212047) adunning@cooley.com J. ASHETON LEMAY (pro hac vice) alemay@cooley.com KAYLA BLAKER (pro hac vice) kblaker@cooley.com 3175 Hanover Street Palo Alto, California 94304-1130 Telephone: +1 650 843 5000 Facsimile: +1 650 849 7400 JUDD D. LAUTER (290945) jlauter@cooley.com 3 Embarcadero Center, 20th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-4004 Telephone: +1 415 693 2915 Facsimile: +1 650 849 7400 Counsel for Defendant Midjourney, Inc. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 SARAH ANDERSEN, an individual; KELLY MCKERNAN, an individual; KARLA ORTIZ, an individual, Individual and Representative Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT FOR DEFENDANT MIDJOURNEY, INC. v. STABILITY AI LTD., a UK corporation; STABILITY AI, INC., a Delaware corporation; MIDJOURNEY, INC., a Delaware corporation; DEVIANTART, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CASE NO.: 3:23-CV-00201-WHO Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 47 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 2 1 Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1, Defendant Midjourney, Inc. (“Midjourney”) by and 2 through its undersigned counsel, hereby states that it does not have a parent corporation and further 3 states that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 4 5 Respectfully Submitted, Dated: February 16, 2023 COOLEY LLP 6 7 8 9 By: /s/ Judd Lauter Judd Lauter Angela L. Dunning Kayla Blaker Asheton Lemay Counsel for Defendant Midjourney, Inc. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 COOLEY LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT CASE NO.: 3:23-CV-00201-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?