Andersen et al v. Stability AI Ltd. et al
Filing
47
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Midjourney, Inc. (Lauter, Judd) (Filed on 2/16/2023)
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 47 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
COOLEY LLP
ANGELA L. DUNNING (212047)
adunning@cooley.com
J. ASHETON LEMAY (pro hac vice)
alemay@cooley.com
KAYLA BLAKER (pro hac vice)
kblaker@cooley.com
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, California 94304-1130
Telephone:
+1 650 843 5000
Facsimile:
+1 650 849 7400
JUDD D. LAUTER (290945)
jlauter@cooley.com
3 Embarcadero Center, 20th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-4004
Telephone:
+1 415 693 2915
Facsimile:
+1 650 849 7400
Counsel for Defendant Midjourney, Inc.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
SARAH ANDERSEN, an individual;
KELLY MCKERNAN, an individual;
KARLA ORTIZ, an individual,
Individual and Representative Plaintiffs,
Case No. 3:23-cv-00201-WHO
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE
STATEMENT FOR DEFENDANT
MIDJOURNEY, INC.
v.
STABILITY AI LTD., a UK corporation;
STABILITY AI, INC., a Delaware
corporation; MIDJOURNEY, INC., a
Delaware corporation; DEVIANTART, INC.,
a Delaware corporation,
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: 3:23-CV-00201-WHO
Case 3:23-cv-00201-WHO Document 47 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 2
1
Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 7.1, Defendant Midjourney, Inc. (“Midjourney”) by and
2
through its undersigned counsel, hereby states that it does not have a parent corporation and further
3
states that no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock.
4
5
Respectfully Submitted,
Dated: February 16, 2023
COOLEY LLP
6
7
8
9
By: /s/ Judd Lauter
Judd Lauter
Angela L. Dunning
Kayla Blaker
Asheton Lemay
Counsel for Defendant Midjourney, Inc.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
CASE NO.: 3:23-CV-00201-WHO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?