Archila v. Cates

Filing 19

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Rita F. Lin on 2/7/2024. (mkl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OSCAR ANTONIO ARCHILA, Case No. 23-cv-00512-RFL (PR) Petitioner, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. BRIAN CATES, Respondent. Mail sent by the Court to petitioner was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 12.) Accordingly, this federal habeas corpus action is DISMISSED without prejudice, because petitioner failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute this matter, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, petitioner may move to reopen the suit and have proceedings reinstated. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of respondent, and close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 7, 2024 _________________________ RITA F. LIN United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?