Williams v. Lei et al

Filing 20

STIPULATION AND ORDER dismissing claims against Defendant Lei (Lilly) Lei with prejudice. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 4/17/2024. (ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2024)

1
2
3
4
5

VICK LAW GROUP, APC
Scott Vick (State Bar No. 171944)
301 N. Lake Avenue, Suite 1000
Pasadena, California 91101
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
LEI (LILLY) LEI

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RANDY WILLIAMS, TRUSTEE

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
LEI (LILLY) LEI, et al.,

CASE NO.: 3:23-cv-00835-CRB
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT LEI (LILLY)
LEI WITH PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED
ORDER]

Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT LEI (LILLY) LEI

Case No. 3:23-cv-00835-CRB

1

Plaintiff Randy Williams, Trustee (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Lei (Lilly) Lei (“Lei”),

2

(collectively the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE and

3

AGREE as follows:

4

WHEREAS, the claims in this matter originated in an Adversary Proceeding [Dkt. 1]

5

filed by Plaintiff Randy Williams (“Williams”) on August 22, 2017 in Randy Williams, Trustee

6

of the Luca Liquidating Trust v. Lei (Lilly) Lei, et al. (U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District

7

of Texas, Case No. 17-03375) (the “Adversary Proceeding”);

8
9

WHEREAS, on October 24, 2022, the Bankruptcy Court in the Adversary Proceeding
issued a Report and Recommendations for Withdrawal of the Reference of the Adversary

10

Proceeding to the United States District Court. (Luca International Group, LLC and Randy

11

Williams v. Lei Lei, et al., United States District Court, Southern District of Texas (“USDC”),

12

Case No. 4:22-cv-03709). See Dkt. 39, Adversary Proceeding and USDC Dkt. 1;

13
14

WHEREAS, on January 25, 2023, the Court issued an order granting the Motion to
Withdraw the Reference as to Case No. 17-03375. [USDC Dkt. 3];

15

WHEREAS, on February 15, 2023, a status conference was held, and the Court ordered

16

that the case would be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of

17

California. [USDC Dkt. 4 and 5];

18

WHEREAS, this matter is currently before the above-captioned Court;

19

WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, and Plaintiff has agreed to dismiss his

20

claims against Defendant Lei;

21

////

22

////

23

////

24

////

25

////

26

////

27

////

28

1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT LEI (LILLY) LEI

Case No. 3:23-cv-00835-CRB

1

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED as follows:

2

Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Lei are dismissed with prejudice.

3
4
5

Respectfully submitted,
DATED: April 16, 2024

6

By /s/ Scott Vick
SCOTT VICK
Attorneys for Defendant
LEI (LILLY) LEI

7
8
9

VICK LAW GROUP, APC

DATED: April 16, 2024

JAMES D. PIERCE, ESQ.

10

-and-

11

WALKER & PATTERSON, P.C.

12
13

By /s/ Johnnie Patterson
JOHNNIE PATTERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
RANDY WILLIAMS, TRUSTEE

14
15
16
17
18

I hereby attest that all other signatories listed concur in the filing of this document and have
authorized its filing.
/s/ Scott Vick
Scott Vick

19
20

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Lei are

21

dismissed with prejudice.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

April 17
DATED: _____________,
2024

25

______________________________
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
United States District Judge

26
27
28

2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS CLAIMS
AGAINST DEFENDANT LEI (LILLY) LEI

Case No. 3:23-cv-00835-CRB