Anoke et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al

Filing 35

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO SUPPLEMENT CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT granting #19 Administrative Motion. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/6/2023)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SARAH ANOKE, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
TWITTER, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

14
15
16
17
18
19

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
SUPPLEMENT CORPORATE
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Re: Dkt. No. 19

12
13

Case No. 23-cv-02217-SI

Plaintiffs have filed an administrative motion seeking an order directing defendants to
supplement their corporate disclosure statement. The Court has reviewed the briefing and concludes
that because X Holdings Corporation is a privately owned corporation, Civil Local Rule 3-15
requires defendants to disclose who owns X Holdings Corporation because that person or persons
have a “financial interest of any kind in the subject matter in controversy.”
Accordingly, defendants are directed to file a supplemented corporate disclosure statement
no later than June 9, 2023.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: June 6, 2023

______________________________________
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge