Edwards v. California Supreme Court

Filing 27

Order to Cease Contact with Proposed Order Email Address. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on February 6, 2024. (amolc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 MYEISHA M. EDWARDS, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 23-cv-02253-AMO v. CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT, ORDER TO CEASE CONTACT WITH “PROPOSED ORDER” EMAIL ADDRESS Defendant. The Court is informed that Plaintiff Myeisha M. Edwards continues to send various 12 materials and messages to the “proposed order” inbox at amopo@cand.uscourts.gov. The 13 “proposed order” email address is intended only for the submission of proposed orders related to 14 papers filed on the record. Edwards and other litigants are not permitted to communicate with the 15 Court through that email address. The Clerk shall disregard the materials and messages Edwards 16 has sent to that email address. 17 In light of Edwards’s excessive and improper use of that email address, the Court 18 ORDERS Edwards to cease all communication with amopo@cand.uscourts.gov. The Court 19 hereby relieves Edwards from the obligations to submit proposed orders and chambers copies. 20 Any documents that Edwards wishes to submit to the Court must be filed on the public record 21 through the Clerk’s Office. If Edwards continues to send emails to the proposed order inbox, the 22 Clerk shall notify the Court of any such noncompliance and otherwise disregard any such emails, 23 and Edwards’s email address may be blocked from that address. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 6, 2024 26 27 28 ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?