Ramirez v. Swift
Filing
36
Order adopting 28 Report and Recommendations re dismissal. The Court hereby DISMISSES the case in its entirety with prejudice. Signed by Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin on November 13, 2023. (amolc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
ELIAS TORRES RAMIREZ,
7
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
TAYLOR ALISON SWIFT,
10
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 23-cv-03826-AMO
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Re: Dkt. No. 28
12
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore’s Report and
13
14
Recommendation to dismiss this case for failure to file an amended in forma pauperis application
15
or pay the filing fee, as well as Mr. Ramirez’s further filings, none of which appear to be
16
objections to the Report. The Court finds the Report correct, well-reasoned and thorough, and
17
adopts it in every respect.
In particular, the Court agrees with Judge Westmore’s recommendation that Ramirez’s
18
19
complaint be dismissed with prejudice because the factual allegations are plainly frivolous. As
20
noted, courts have “the unusual power to pierce the veil of the complaint’s factual allegations and
21
dismiss those claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless.” ECF 28 at 2 (quoting
22
Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989)). To the extent that Ramirez alleges that he is
23
married to singer Taylor Swift, that various non-defendants are making false charges against him,
24
and that he is entitled to the Osama Bin Laden reward money, his complaint plainly fails to satisfy
25
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).
26
//
27
//
28
//
1
Accordingly, the Court hereby DISMISSES the case in its entirety with prejudice.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
Dated: November 13, 2023
______________________________________
ARACELI MARTÍNEZ-OLGUÍN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?