Colvin et al v. Roblox Corporation et al

Filing 66

Supplemental Order Regarding Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 3/28/2024. (vclc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2024)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RACHELLE COLVIN, et al.,

Case No. 23-cv-04146-VC

Plaintiffs,
SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER
REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS

v.
ROBLOX CORPORATION, et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 31

Defendants.

The Court inadvertently omitted mention of the disposition of two of the plaintiffs’
claims in its order on the motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 65.
The plaintiffs’ claim for civil conspiracy is dismissed for the same reason as the RICO
claim: the complaint fails to plead the existence of a conspiracy that includes Roblox. The
plaintiffs’ claim for unjust enrichment may move forward, as they have sufficiently pled a lack
of an adequate remedy at law. The plaintiffs explain that merely compensating them for the
gambling losses is not enough, because Roblox takes a sizable cut of all transactions involving
Robux on its platform—so they allege that Robux has been enriched by more than the plaintiffs
have lost. Moreover, the plaintiffs are not only seeking compensation for past wrongs but also an
end to the conduct in the future. In all, their claims for equitable relief are adequately pled and
may proceed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2024
______________________________________
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge