Gjovik v. Apple Inc.
Filing
122
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen re 116 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification and Correction. (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ASHLEY M GJOVIK,
8
Plaintiff,
10
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR CLARIFICATION AND
CORRECTION
v.
9
Case No. 23-cv-04597-EMC
Docket No. 116
12
13
14
Plaintiff has filed a motion in which she seeks a clarification and a correction to a hearing
15
transcript. Defendant has filed a statement of nonopposition. The Court hereby rules as follows.
1.
16
17
Absent further order of the Court, Plaintiff may make Zoom appearances for case
management conferences/status conferences.
2.
18
Absent further order of the Court, Plaintiff may also appear by Zoom for a hearing
19
on any substantive (i.e., nonadministrative) motion. However, (a) there is the risk that there may
20
be connectivity or other technical problems which the Court cannot predict and (2) Defendant has
21
the right to attend in person.
3.
22
The Court shall not order any correction to the transcript for the hearing on August
23
28, 2024. This order reflects the Court’s understanding that there were connectivity or other
24
technical problems with the hybrid (Zoom/in-person) hearing. The Court’s rulings on the motion
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
to dismiss which was heard on that day were not impacted or otherwise affected by any
2
connectivity or other technical problems.
3
4
This order disposes of Docket No. 116.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: October 25, 2024
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?