Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 75.31.74.165
Filing
9
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 8 Ex Parte Application for Leave to Serve a Third Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2023)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
v.
JOHN DOE SUBSCRIBER ASSIGNED IP
ADDRESS 75.31.74.165,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 23-cv-05495-TSH
ORDER GRANTING EX-PARTE
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE
THIRD PARTY SUBPOENA PRIOR TO
A RULE 26(F) CONFERENCE
Re: Dkt. No. 8
12
13
THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Ex-Parte Application for Leave to
14
Serve a Third-Party Subpoena Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference, and the Court being duly advised
15
does FIND, ORDER AND ADJUDGE:
16
1. Plaintiff has established “good cause” exists to serve a third-party subpoena on the
17
internet service provider, AT&T Internet (the “ISP”). See UMG Recording, Inc. v. Doe, 2008 WL
18
4104214, *4 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2008) (collecting cases); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, 2018 WL
19
357287, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2018).
20
2. Plaintiff may serve the ISP with a Rule 45 subpoena commanding the ISP to provide the
21
true name and address of the Defendant to whom the ISP assigned an IP address as set forth on
22
Exhibit A to the Complaint. Plaintiff shall attach a copy of this Order to the subpoena;
23
24
3. Plaintiff may also serve a Rule 45 subpoena in the same manner on any service provider
that is identified in response to a subpoena as a provider of Internet services to the Defendant;
25
4. If the ISP qualifies as a “cable operator” under 47 U.S.C. § 522(5), which defines the
26
term “cable operator” as “any person or group of persons (A) who provides cable service over a
27
cable system and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant interest in such cable
28
system, or (B) who otherwise controls or is responsible for, through any arrangement, the
1
management and operation of such a cable system,” the ISP shall comply with 47 U.S.C. §
2
551(c)(2)(B), which provides that “[a] cable operator may disclose such [personal identifying]
3
information if the disclosure is . . . made pursuant to a court order authorizing such disclosure, if
4
the subscriber is notified of such order by the person to whom the order is directed,” by sending a
5
copy of this Order to the Defendant; and
6
7
served on the ISP for the purpose of protecting and enforcing Plaintiff’s rights as set forth in its
8
Complaint.
9
United States District Court
Northern District of California
5. Plaintiff may only use the information disclosed in response to a Rule 45 subpoena
6. The ISP shall serve a copy of the subpoena and a copy of this order on the
10
subscriber within 30 days of the date of service on the ISP. The ISP may serve the subscribers
11
using any reasonable means, including written notice sent to the subscriber’s last known address,
12
transmitted either by first-class mail or via overnight service.
13
7. Each subscriber and the ISP shall have 30 days from the date of service upon him, her,
14
or it to file any motions in this court contesting the subpoena (including a motion to quash or
15
modify the subpoena). If the 30-day period lapses without the subscriber contesting the subpoena,
16
the ISP shall have 10 days to produce to Plaintiff the information responsive to the subpoena with
17
respect to that subscriber.
18
8. The ISP shall preserve all subpoenaed information pending the ISP’s delivering such
19
information to Plaintiff or the final resolution of a timely filed motion to quash the subpoena with
20
respect to such information.
21
22
23
9. Any name or other personal identifying information of any current or proposed
defendant shall be filed UNDER SEAL in all filings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: November 13, 2023
26
THOMAS S. HIXSON
United States Magistrate Judge
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?