J. et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 100

ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. Signed by Judge Lisa J. Cisneros on 10/28/2024. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 J.T., Case No. 23-cv-06524-LJC Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California 11 ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Re: Dkt. No. 96 Defendants. 12 The Court has reviewed the parties’ respective positions on expert disclosures for class 13 14 certification as set forth in their October 17, 2024 status report. ECF No. 96. Plaintiffs’ proposal 15 to prohibit the use of expert opinion evidence for that purpose, and Defendants’ proposal to set no 16 schedule for disclosure prior to class certification, are both DENIED. Instead, the Court ORDERS 17 as follows. Any parties that intend to use expert opinion evidence in the context of class certification 18 19 must disclose the expert(s) they intend to use for that purpose under Rule 26(a)(2) no later than 20 February 18, 2025. Rebuttal experts for class certification, if any, shall be disclosed no later than 21 March 4, 2024. If Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (due March 18, 2025, per ECF No. 91) includes 22 23 arguments that Defendants reasonably did not anticipate, Defendants may file an administrative 24 motion for leave to present undisclosed expert opinions no later than March 21, 2025. Plaintiffs 25 must respond no later than March 24, 2025. Both parties’ submissions must include their 26 positions on an appropriate briefing schedule if the Court grants Defendants permission to use new 27 expert opinion evidence. If the administrative motion is granted, the Court will extend the briefing 28 /// 1 schedule—and likely the hearing date—to allow both parties to obtain and present expert opinion 2 evidence. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 28, 2024 5 6 LISA J. CISNEROS United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?