J. et al v. City and County of San Francisco et al
Filing
100
ORDER REGARDING EXPERT DISCLOSURES FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. Signed by Judge Lisa J. Cisneros on 10/28/2024. (bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
J.T.,
Case No. 23-cv-06524-LJC
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER REGARDING EXPERT
DISCLOSURES FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
Re: Dkt. No. 96
Defendants.
12
The Court has reviewed the parties’ respective positions on expert disclosures for class
13
14
certification as set forth in their October 17, 2024 status report. ECF No. 96. Plaintiffs’ proposal
15
to prohibit the use of expert opinion evidence for that purpose, and Defendants’ proposal to set no
16
schedule for disclosure prior to class certification, are both DENIED. Instead, the Court ORDERS
17
as follows.
Any parties that intend to use expert opinion evidence in the context of class certification
18
19
must disclose the expert(s) they intend to use for that purpose under Rule 26(a)(2) no later than
20
February 18, 2025. Rebuttal experts for class certification, if any, shall be disclosed no later than
21
March 4, 2024.
If Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (due March 18, 2025, per ECF No. 91) includes
22
23
arguments that Defendants reasonably did not anticipate, Defendants may file an administrative
24
motion for leave to present undisclosed expert opinions no later than March 21, 2025. Plaintiffs
25
must respond no later than March 24, 2025. Both parties’ submissions must include their
26
positions on an appropriate briefing schedule if the Court grants Defendants permission to use new
27
expert opinion evidence. If the administrative motion is granted, the Court will extend the briefing
28
///
1
schedule—and likely the hearing date—to allow both parties to obtain and present expert opinion
2
evidence.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2024
5
6
LISA J. CISNEROS
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?