Blackhawk Network, Inc. v. Computer Services, Inc. et al
Filing
28
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re: JC Steel Targets, Inc. An in-person Show Cause Hearing is SET for April 30, 2024 at 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang. Petitioner shall file a response to the Order to Show Cause no later than April 23, 2024. Respondent CSI may file a memorandum addressing its views on the issue no later than April 26, 2024.Signed by Judge Peter H. Kang on 03/26/24. (phklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2024)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
7
8
BLACKHAWK NETWORK, INC.,
Petitioner,
9
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
COMPUTER SERVICES, INC., et al.,
Respondents.
12
Case No. 23-mc-80303-PHK
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: JC
STEEL TARGETS, INC.
Show Cause Hearing Date: April 30, 2024
Show Cause Hearing Time: 2:00 p.m.
Show Cause Hearing Place: Courtroom F
13
INTRODUCTION
14
This is a miscellaneous action to compel arbitration. On November 14, 2023, Petitioner
15
16
Blackhawk Network, Inc. (“Petitioner”) commenced this action requesting that the Court issue an
17
Order compelling Respondents Computer Services, Inc. (“CSI”) and JC Steel Targets, Inc. (“JC
18
Steel”) to arbitrate certain claims filed by Petitioner before the American Arbitration Association
19
(“AAA”) in San Francisco, California on May 2, 2023. [Dkt. 1]. The issue before the Court and
20
addressed by this Order to Show Cause is the status of JC Steel.
21
The petition identifies JC Steel as a defunct Washington corporation with its principal
22
place of business in Spokane, Washington. Id. at ¶¶ 9, 16. The petition alleges that “JC Steel
23
initially participated in the AAA Arbitration, but then voluntarily dissolved one day after the
24
preliminary hearing and is now refusing to participate.” Id. at ¶ 9. The petition alleges that JC
25
Steel continues to operate, notwithstanding its dissolution, through “a new Washington
26
corporation with a nearly identical name.” Id. at ¶ 10. The “new” corporation through which JC
27
Steel is alleged to now operate, Hall Ventures-JC Steel Targets Inc., is not named as a Party to this
28
action.
1
2
[Dkt. 17]. The affidavit indicates that Petitioner’s process server effected service of JC Steel as
3
permitted by Rule 43 of the AAA Commercial Rules, first, by mailing copies of the petition,
4
summons, and this Court’s Standing Orders to JC Steel’s last known address in Cheney,
5
Washington, and alternatively, by emailing the petition and this Court’s Standing Orders to JC
6
Steel’s owner, Jake Vibbert. Id. at ¶¶ 9-15.
7
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On January 5, 2024, Petitioner filed an affidavit of service on behalf of JC Steel and CSI.
One month after filing the affidavit of service, on February 5, 2024, Petitioner filed a
8
motion to compel arbitration pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 4. [Dkt. 18]. On
9
February 20, 2024, CSI filed a response in opposition to Petitioner’s motion to compel, and on
10
February 27, 2024, Petitioner filed a reply. [Dkts. 21, 25]. To date, JC has not responded to the
11
motion to compel or otherwise appeared in this case.
12
DISCUSSION
13
Based on the record presented by Petitioner, it is unclear whether JC Steel has been
14
properly served and thus has notice of this federal court action and the pending motion to compel
15
arbitration. While Petitioner and CSI have both consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this
16
case, as of the date of this Order to Show Cause, JC Steel has not submitted any filing indicating
17
its consent (or declination) to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.
18
Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), all parties named in a civil action (regardless of whether such
19
parties have been served or entered appearances) must consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction for
20
dispositive decisions. Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 503-04 (9th Cir. 2017). The pending
21
motion to compel arbitration is a dispositive motion requiring the consent of all parties. See, e.g.,
22
Langell v. Ideal Homes LLC, No. 16-cv-00821-HRL, 2016 WL 8711704, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov.
23
18, 2016). Accordingly, unless the Court obtains consent from JC Steel (or alternatively,
24
Petitioner voluntarily dismisses JC Steel from this action under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)), the
25
undersigned cannot issue an Order on the pending motion to compel arbitration, but instead, must
26
issue a report and recommendation on the motion and refer the case to a district judge.
27
28
In light of the foregoing, Petitioner is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE before this
Court by filing a memorandum (no longer than five (5) pages in length) on or before April 23,
2
1
2
1. Whether and on what grounds JC Steel has been properly served in compliance with the
3
requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and in particular, Federal Rule of
4
Civil Procedure 4, and if not, whether this action should be dismissed for failure to
5
effectuate service and failure to prosecute as to JC Steel.
6
United States District Court
Northern District of California
2024 which addresses the following:
2. The steps taken by Petitioner to communicate with JC Steel and the owner of JC Steel,
7
Jake Vibbert, to inform both JC Steel and Vibbert about the pendency of this action, and to
8
discuss sufficiency of service on JC Steel, whether JC Steel will consent or decline
9
Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, the deadline for JC Steel to file the Court’s required form for
10
indicating either consent or declination to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction, and whether JC
11
Steel plans to participate in this action substantively.
12
3. Whether Hall Ventures-JC Steel Targets, Inc. should be added as a named Party in the
13
instant action, and the reasons why or why not, including whether Hall Ventures-JC Steel
14
Targets, Inc. should be substituted for JC Steel, whether adding Hall Ventures-JC Steel
15
Targets, Inc. will cause JC Steel to enter appearance, and the status of any communications
16
with Hall Ventures-JC Steel Targets, Inc. regarding this matter (including issues relating to
17
service on and consent/declination of Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by JC Steel).
18
The Court further ORDERS that Respondent CSI may file its own memorandum
19
(maximum five (5) pages long) addressing its views on the issues above, on or before April 26,
20
2024.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
The Court further ORDERS Petitioner to promptly serve a copy of this Order on JC Steel
and to promptly send a copy of this Order to Jake Vibbert by email.
An in-person SHOW CAUSE HEARING is SET for April 30, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. in
Courtroom F on the 15th floor of the San Francisco courthouse.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 26, 2024
______________________________________
PETER H. KANG
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?