Hall v. California Massage Therapy Council

Filing 11

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (adopting 7 Report and Recommendations). (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2024) Copy of order mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff.Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 8/30/2024 (cl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 KEVIN HALL, Case No. 24-cv-02108-RS Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 12 13 CALIFORNIA MASSAGE THERAPY COUNCIL, 14 Defendant. 15 16 The magistrate judge to whom this matter was initially assigned issued an order dismissing 17 the complaint with leave to amend, and warning plaintiff that failure to file a timely first amended 18 complaint would result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. See Dkt. No. 6. When 19 no amended complaint was filed, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that 20 the case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 7. The matter was then 21 reassigned to the undersigned for disposition. 22 Plaintiff apparently has failed to keep the court apprised of his address, as the reassignment 23 order and the Report and Recommendation were returned as undeliverable. In light of that, and 24 given plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint, dismissal is warranted, and the Report and 25 Recommendation is hereby adopted. The case is dismissed, and the Clerk shall close the file. 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 Dated: August 30, 2024 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG Chief United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 2 24-cv-02108-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?