Jiaren Zhu v The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule "A"

Filing 10

ORDER by Judge Seeborg denying #6 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
JIAREN ZHU,

10

Case No. 24-cv-03128-RS

Plaintiff,
11

United States District Court
Northern District of California

v.
12
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND
UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A”,

13
14

ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING
ORDER

Defendants.
15
Plaintiff Jiaren Zhu, appearing pro se,1 seeks an ex parte temporary restraining order and a

16
17

temporary injunction enjoining the manufacture, importation, distribution, offering for sale, and

18

sale of products—magnetic key holders—that he contends infringe his design patent, U.S. Patent

19

No. D813317S. He also prays for a “temporary asset restraint” and expedited discovery. Zhu

20

requests the order be entered against “the partnerships and unincorporated associations identified

21

on Schedule ‘A,’” attached to the complaint, which is also how the caption of the complaint

22

identifies defendants.
The body of the complaint, however, makes clear that the 50 names listed on “Schedule

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The caption of the motion bears the name and state bar number of an attorney, with a San Jose,
CA address, identified as “Attorneys for Defendants [sic] Jiaren Zhu.” The caption of all of the
supporting papers, however, show Zhu as a pro se litigant at that same San Jose address. The
attorney listed in the motion caption also submits a supporting declaration stating she resides in
“the City of Denver, in the State of California [sic]” and that she is serving as a “consultant.”

1

‘A’” are not the individuals and/or entities who are allegedly selling infringing key holders.

2

Rather, those names are “aliases” used to operate e-commerce stores through the Amazon website.

3

Zhu’s allegation is that defendants, whose true identities he does not know, are individuals and

4

business entities that own and operate one or more of the e-commerce stores offering key holders

5

using his patented design. Indeed, the implication is that only a relatively small number of

6

individuals or entities are engaged in the alleged infringement—and it is those persons and/or

7

entities that are the defendants—i.e., there are not 50 defendants as listed on Schedule A.
Zhu is, of course, entitled to bring suit prior to ascertaining the true identities of the

8

United States District Court
Northern District of California

9

persons he intends to name as defendants. He may file an application to serve early discovery

10

directed at uncovering defendants’ identities if he believes there is a practical way to do so. Any

11

such application should specify what information would be sought, and the persons on which any

12

subpoenas would be served.

13

Zhu has not shown, however, that he is entitled to a temporary restraining order or

14

preliminary injunction at this juncture, and his application is denied without prejudice to renewal,

15

when and if he is able to ascertain defendants’ identities and serve them with summons and

16

complaint, and give notice of his request for preliminary relief. Rule 65(b)(1) of the Federal Rules

17

of Civil Procedure provides that a temporary restraining order may issue without notice only

18

where “specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and

19

irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard

20

in opposition.”2
Here, the only assertion of immediate harm to support ex parte relief is Zhu’s contention

21
22

that “unless Defendants’ assets are frozen, Defendants will likely hide or move their ill-gotten

23

funds to offshore bank accounts.” As an initial matter, a federal court generally lacks jurisdiction

24

to issue an “asset freeze” simply to ensure that any judgment a plaintiff may ultimately obtain will

25
2

26
27

A preliminary injunction, which Zhu also seeks, cannot issue without notice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65
(a). Until Zhu identifies defendants, notice is not possible, so no hearing on a preliminary
injunction will be set.

28

CASE NO.

2

24-cv-03128-RS

1

be collectible. See Grupo Mexicano de Desarollo, S.A. v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308,

2

319–320, 119 S.Ct. 1961 (1999) (holding that in an action for money damages, a district court has

3

no power to issue a preliminary injunction preventing a defendant from transferring assets in

4

which no lien or equitable interest is claimed.) Nevertheless, assuming Zhu might be able to claim

5

an equitable interest in the specific funds that constitute proceeds from the sales of infringing

6

products, the conclusory assertion that defendants will “hide or move” those funds offshore if

7

given notice is insufficient. Zhu has not offered any facts to suggest that sales proceeds even pass

8

through or are held in accounts within the territorial jurisdiction of this court, or if they are, that

9

giving notice of a temporary restraining order application would result in the funds being moved

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

before an order could issue.
More fundamentally, Zhu has not established ex parte relief is warranted because he has

12

not shown how defendants can meaningfully be restrained by any order, where their identities are

13

unknown, and where it cannot even be determined how many of them there are. See Fed. R. Civ.

14

P. 65 (d)(2) (order binds only those who receive actual notice of it by personal service or

15

otherwise). Accordingly, the motion is denied.

16
17
18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19
20
21
22

Dated: June 4, 2024
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
Chief United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO.

3

24-cv-03128-RS