Ryan v. X Corp

Filing 55

ORDER granting 54 First MOTION for Extension of Time. Deadlines reset as to 48 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 3/10/2025. Reply due by 3/24/2025. Motion Hearing reset for 4/9/2025 02:00 PM via Videoconference before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/06/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2025)

Download PDF
1 Donna Etemadi, SBN 354563 Etemadi Legal Group PC 2 137 Pineview 3 Irvine, CA 92620 Tel: (323)688-0616 4 Email: donna@elglaw.co 5 Attorney for Jeremy Ryan 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY RYAN, a California individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 v. X CORP., a Nevada corporation, Case No.: 3:24-cv-03553-WHO REQUEST WITHOUT OPPOSITION FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF AN OPPOSITION TO X CORP.’S MOTOIN TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 48) Defendant. Assigned to the Hon. William H. Orrick 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 3:24-cv-03553-WHO REQUEST WITHOUT OPPOSITION FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME 1 Under Civil L.R. 7-12 and 6-1(b), plaintiff Jeremy Ryan respectfully requests an order 2 (a) changing the deadline for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to X Corp.’s Motion to Dismiss 3 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 48; “Third Motion to Dismiss”) from March 5, 4 2025 to March 10, 2025, and (b) assuming that Plaintiff files his Opposition to the Third Motion 5 to Dismiss on or before March 10, 2025, resetting the deadline for X Corp. to file a reply in 6 further support of its Third Motion to Dismiss to March 24, 2025. 7 WHEREAS, on June 12, 2024, plaintiff filed his Complaint (ECF No. 1); 8 WHEREAS, on June 13, 2024, this case was assigned to the Honorable Kandis A. 9 Westmore (ECF No. 3); 10 WHEREAS, on July 10, 2024, Defendant X Corp. filed a Motion to Dismiss the 11 Complaint Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 13; “First Motion to 12 Dismiss”); 13 WHEREAS, on July 17, 2024, this case was reassigned to the Honorable William H. 14 Orrick (ECF No. 18); 15 WHEREAS, on September 4, 2024, this Court issued its Order Granting Motion to 16 Dismiss (ECF No. 29), which granted X Corp.’s First Motion to Dismiss and allowed Plaintiff 17 until September 24, 2024 to file an amended complaint; 18 WHEREAS, on September 24, 2024, Plaintiff filed his First Amended Complaint 19 (“FAC”) (ECF No. 30); 20 WHEREAS, on October 8, 2024, Defendant X Corp. filed its Motion to Dismiss 21 Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 32; “Second Motion to Dismiss”); 22 WHEREAS, on December 9, 2024, this Court issued its Order Granting Motion to 23 Dismiss (ECF No. 41), which granted X Corp.’s Second Motion to Dismiss and allowed Plaintiff 24 until January 8, 2025 to file a further amended complaint; 25 WHEREAS, on January 9, 2025, this Court granted the Parties’ Stipulated Request for an 26 Order Enlarging Time for Plaintiff’s Filing of the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 43), 27 which extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file his Second Amended Complaint to January 15, 2025; 28 1 Case No.: 3:24-cv-03553-WHO REQUEST WITHOUT OPPOSITION FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME 1 WHEREAS, on January 18, 2025, this Court granted Plaintiff’s Request Without 2 Opposition for an Order Enlarging Time for Plaintiff’s Filing of the Second Amended Complaint 3 (ECF No. 45), which again extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file his Second Amended Complaint 4 to January 22, 2025; 5 WHEREAS, on January 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint; 6 WHEREAS, on February 12, 2025, Defendant X Corp. filed its Motion to Dismiss 7 Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 48; “Third Motion to Dismiss”); 8 WHEREAS, on February 28, 2025, this Court granted the parties’ stipulated request for 9 an order enlarging time for Plaintiff to file an Opposition to the Third Motion to Dismiss (ECF 10 No. 52), which extended Plaintiff’s deadline to file an Opposition to the Third Motion to Dismiss 11 from February 26, 2025 to March 5, 2025, and reset X Corp.’s deadline to file a reply in further 12 support of its Third Motion to Dismiss to March 19, 2025; 13 WHEREAS, lead trial counsel for the Parties have met and conferred, and Plaintiff has 14 requested (a) an additional five-day extension to file an Opposition to the Third Motion to 15 Dismiss from March 5, 2025 to March 10, 2025, and (b) assuming that Plaintiff files his 16 Opposition to the Third Motion to Dismiss on or before March 10, 2025, a reset of X Corp.’s 17 deadline to file a reply in further support of its Third Motion to Dismiss from March 19, 2025 to 18 March 24, 2025; 19 WHEREAS, X Corp. does not oppose Plaintiff’s request. 20 THEREFORE, IN LIGHT OF THE FOREGOING, PLAINTIFF HEREBY REQUESTS 21 THAT: 22 The deadline to file Plaintiff’s Opposition shall be changed from March 5, 2025 to March 23 10, 2025, and the deadline for Defendant to file a reply in further support of its Third Motion to 24 Dismiss shall be reset for March 24, 2025. 25 Respectfully submitted, 26 Dated: March 5, 2025 ETEMADI LEGAL GROUP PC 27 28 By: /s/Donna Etemadi Donna Etemadi Attorneys for Plaintiff Jeremy Ryan 2 Case No.: 3:24-cv-03553-WHO REQUEST WITHOUT OPPOSITION FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME 1 2 3 4 5 6 PURSUANT TO PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND DEFENDANT’S NON-OPPOSITION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The Hearing is continued to April 9, 2025 at 2:00 p.m. March 6, 2025 Dated: __________________ ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 3:24-cv-03553-WHO REQUEST WITHOUT OPPOSITION FOR AN ORDER ENLARGING TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?