Briggs et al v. Midland Bank, Insurance Bond, Doe 1 et al

Filing 24

ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/28/2024. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

BRYAN BRIGGS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Case No. 24-cv-04472-WHO
ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.
MIDLAND BANK, INSURANCE BOND,
et al.,

Re: Dkt. No. 22

Defendants.

12
13

The plaintiff in this case missed the deadline to file an amended complaint. See Dkt. No.

14

21 (granting defendant’s motion to dismiss and giving plaintiff 20 days from September 27, 2024,

15

to file an amended complaint). The original complaint came nowhere close to asserting a

16

plausible claim against any defendant in this case. See Dkt. No. 1. Accordingly, this matter is

17

hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute, and any hearings

18

scheduled in this matter are VACATED. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(2).

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 28, 2024

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

William H. Orrick
United States District Judge