Awasthi v. Intel Corporation

Filing 17

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Show Cause Response due by 3/20/2025. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 3/4/2025. (tshlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/4/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 VINAY K. AWASTHI, 7 Plaintiff, 8 Case No. 24-cv-05621-TSH ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 9 INTEL CORPORATION, 10 Defendant. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Plaintiff Vinay Awasthi brings this complaint alleging Defendant Intel Corporation 13 violated the federal False Claims Act by making “false claims about health of its platforms[.]” 14 Compl. at 21, ECF No. 1. On January 24, 2025, the government filed a Notice of Election to 15 Decline Intervention. ECF No. 14. As such, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file by February 27, 16 2025 either a notice of appearance through counsel or an amended complaint. ECF No. 15. 17 Plaintiff has failed to respond. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court deadlines. Plaintiff shall file a declaration by March 20, 2025. Notice is hereby provided that failure to file a written response will be deemed an admission that you do not intend to prosecute, and this case will likely be dismissed. Thus, it is imperative the Court receive a written response by the deadline above. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 4, 2025 THOMAS S. HIXSON United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?