Isgur v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT'S 22 MOTION TO DISMISS. Response due by 1/21/2025. Reply due by 2/20/2025. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/26/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2024)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 1970 Broadway, Suite 1070 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 254-6808 Facsimile: (202) 973-0950 apersinger@tzlegal.com 10 Hassan A. Zavareei (State Bar No. 181547) Gemma Seidita (State Bar No. 322201) TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 1010 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 973-0900 Facsimile: (202) 973-0950 hzavareei@tzlegal.com gseidita@tzlegal.com 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class 6 7 8 9 12 Walter F. Brown (State Bar No. 130248) Meredith R. Dearborn (State Bar No. 268312) PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 535 Mission Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (628) 432-5100 Facsimile: (628) 232-3101 wbrown@paulweiss.com mdearborn@paulweiss.com Melissa Felder Zappala (pro hac vice) PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 2001 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 223-7300 Facsimile: (202) 223-7420 mzappala@paulweiss.com Attorneys for Defendant 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 18 19 20 SARA ISGUR, individually and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 v. META PLATFORMS, INC., Case No. 3:24-cv-06559-WHO JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS Judge: Hon. William H. Orrick Defendant. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:24-CV-06559-WHO 1 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1, 6-2, and 7-12, Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (“Meta”) and 2 Plaintiff Sara Isgur respectfully submit the following stipulation: 3 4 STIPULATION WHEREAS, on September 18, 2024, Plaintiff Sara Isgur filed the above captioned complaint 5 (see ECF No. 1); 6 WHEREAS, on October 9, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation extending the time for 7 Meta to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint from October 11, 2024 to November 19, 2024 8 (see ECF No. 15); 9 WHEREAS, on November 13, 2024, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to stay discovery and 10 continue the initial case management conference pending resolution of Meta’s then forthcoming 11 motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint (see ECF No. 20), which the Court entered on November 14, 12 2024 (see ECF No. 21); 13 WHEREAS, on November 19, 2024, Meta filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint (see 14 ECF No. 22); 15 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-3(a) and 7-3(c), Plaintiff’s opposition to Defendant’s 16 motion to dismiss will be due on December 3, 2024, and Defendant’s reply in support of its motion 17 to dismiss will be due on December 10, 2024; 18 WHEREAS, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B), Plaintiff’s deadline to amend her 19 complaint is December 10, 2024; 20 WHEREAS, the parties agreed to extend the time for Plaintiff to either oppose Defendant’s 21 motion to dismiss or to amend her complaint; 22 WHEREAS, the parties agree that Defendant’s motion to dismiss is not vacated until after 23 Plaintiff amends her complaint; 24 WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(b), given the complexity of the issues raised in 25 Defendant’s motion, the parties agree that good cause exists to set a briefing schedule to ensure that 26 the parties have the opportunity to address the issues raised by Defendant in its motion, while also 27 taking into account recent leave by lawyers in the litigation as well as pre-planned holiday travel in 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:24-CV-06559-WHO 1 December; 2 NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE as follows: 3 1. Plaintiff shall either file her opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss or amend 4 her complaint by January 21, 2025. 5 2. If Plaintiff chooses to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Defendant shall file its 6 reply in support of its motion to dismiss by February 20, 2025. 7 8 Date: November 25, 2024 Respectfully submitted, 9 /s/Walter F. Brown Walter F. Brown (State Bar No. 130248) Meredith R. Dearborn (State Bar No. 268312) PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 535 Mission Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (628) 432-5100 Facsimile: (628) 232-3101 wbrown@paulweiss.com mdearborn@paulweiss.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 /s/ Annick M. Persinger Annick M. Persinger (State Bar No. 272996) TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 1970 Broadway, Suite 1070 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 254-6808 Facsimile: (202) 973-0950 apersinger@tzlegal.com Hassan A. Zavareei (State Bar No. 181547) Gemma Seidita (State Bar No. 322201) TYCKO & ZAVAREEI LLP 2000 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 1010 Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 973-0900 Facsimile: (202) 973-0950 hzavareei@tzlegal.com gseidita@tzlegal.com Melissa Felder Zappala (pro hac vice) PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP 2001 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 223-7300 Facsimile: (202) 223-7420 mzappala@paulweiss.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class Attorneys for Defendant 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:24-CV-06559-WHO 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 1. Plaintiff shall either file her opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss or amend 3 her complaint by January 21, 2025. 4 2. If Plaintiff chooses to oppose Defendant’s motion to dismiss, Defendant shall file its 5 reply in support of its motion to dismiss by February 20, 2025. 6 7 DATED: November 26, 2024 _____________________________ 8 HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:24-CV-06559-WHO 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(h)(3), Annick M. Persinger herby attests that concurrence in the 3 filing of this document has been obtained from each of the above signatories. 4 5 Dated: November 25, 2024 /s/ Annick M. Persinger Annick M. Persinger 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS CASE NO. 3:24-CV-06559-WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?