Bouri et al v. Stonebrae Homeowners Association et al

Filing 36

Order by Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros granting 34 STIPULATION CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT. Defendant's Response to Complaint due by 2/28/2025; Case Management Statement due by 3/6/2025; Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/13/2025 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2025)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 IRENE KARBELASHVILI, Esq. (SBN 232223) IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI, Esq. (SBN 302971) ALLACCESS LAW GROUP 1400 Coleman Ave Ste F28 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Telephone: (408) 295-0137 Fax: (408) 295-0142 irene@allaccesslawgroup.com irakli@allaccesslawgroup.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Peter L. Weber – 218473 PWeber@mpbf.com Keith G. Adams – 240497 KAdams@mpbf.com MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY 580 California Street, Suite 1100 San Francisco, CA 94104-1001 Telephone: (415) 788-1900 Facsimile: (415) 393-8087 Attorneys for Defendants, STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 TINA BOURI; SAMER BOURI; and BANDALI BOURI, by and through his guardian ad litem, LUAY BOURI, 19 Plaintiffs, 20 v. 21 22 STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.; CASE NO. 24-cv-06869-LJC Civil Rights STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 23 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC -1- 1 Plaintiffs TINA BOURI; SAMER BOURI; and BANDALI BOURI, by and through his 2 guardian ad litem, LUAY BOURI (“Plaintiffs”) and STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS 3 ASSOCIATION (“Stonebrae”); and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. 4 (“HAS”) (collectively with Stonebrae, “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) 5 stipulate and respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference currently 6 scheduled for February 13, 2025 be continue to February 27, 2025 or, alternatively, March 13, 7 2025. The Parties further stipulate that the deadline for Defendants to response to Plaintiffs’ 8 complaint be continued from January27, 2025 to February 28, 2025. The Parties believe good 9 cause exists based on the following: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 1. On October 1, 2024, the Court scheduled the Initial Case Management Conference for January 2, 2025. 2. On December 20, 2024, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to January 23, 2025. 3. On December 23, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation continuing Defendants’ response deadline to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to January 27, 2025. 4. On January 16, 2025, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to February 13, 2025. 5. Plaintiffs’ counsel is not available on February 13, 2025 due to a prepaid vacation abroad from February 5, 2025 to February 20, 2025. 6. The Parties are available on February 27, 2025 for the Initial Case Management 21 Conference. Alternatively, the Parties are also available on March 13, 2025, or a date 22 sometime thereafter that is most convenient for the Court. 23 7. The Parties are working cooperatively to mediate this case and have filed a stipulation 24 requesting that the matter be referred to mediation. To facilitate the potential for an early 25 resolution, the Parties seek additional time to focus on settlement discussions rather than 26 proceeding immediately with briefing on a Rule 12 motion, which Defendants intend to 27 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC -2- 28 1 file. Additional time is also necessary for the Parties to meet and confer regarding the 2 anticipated Rule 12 motion. 3 8. Lastly, because Plaintiffs’ counsel will be unavailable from February 5, 2025, through 4 February 20, 2025, this period of unavailability overlaps with the briefing deadlines should 5 Defendants file their Rule 12 motion by the current deadline of January 27, 2025. 6 7 Respectfully submitted, 8 9 Date: January 22, 2025 ALLACCESS LAW GROUP 10 /s/ Irakli Karbelashvili IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Dated: January 25, 2025 MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY By /s Keith G. Adams Keith G. Adams Attorneys for Defendants STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC. 19 20 FILER’S ATTESTATION 21 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on January 22, 2025, I, Irakli 22 Karbelashvili, received the concurrence of the signatories in the filing of this document. 23 24 25 /s/ Irakli Karbelashvili Irakli Karbelashvili 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC -3- 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Having reviewed the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Initial Case 3 March 13 2025 at 1:30 p.m. The deadline for Management Conference is continued to __________, 4 Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint is continued to February 28, 2025. 5 6 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 27, 2025 _________________________ Hon. Lisa J. Cisneros United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?