Bouri et al v. Stonebrae Homeowners Association et al
Filing
36
Order by Magistrate Judge Lisa J. Cisneros granting 34 STIPULATION CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT. Defendant's Response to Complaint due by 2/28/2025; Case Management Statement due by 3/6/2025; Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/13/2025 at 01:30 PM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only.(bns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2025)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
IRENE KARBELASHVILI, Esq. (SBN 232223)
IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI, Esq. (SBN 302971)
ALLACCESS LAW GROUP
1400 Coleman Ave Ste F28
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Telephone: (408) 295-0137
Fax: (408) 295-0142
irene@allaccesslawgroup.com
irakli@allaccesslawgroup.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Peter L. Weber – 218473
PWeber@mpbf.com Keith G. Adams – 240497
KAdams@mpbf.com
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY 580 California Street, Suite 1100
San Francisco, CA 94104-1001
Telephone: (415) 788-1900
Facsimile: (415) 393-8087
Attorneys for Defendants,
STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION
SERVICES, INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
TINA BOURI; SAMER BOURI; and
BANDALI BOURI, by and through his
guardian ad litem, LUAY BOURI,
19
Plaintiffs,
20
v.
21
22
STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION; and HOMEOWNER
ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.;
CASE NO. 24-cv-06869-LJC
Civil Rights
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS’
COMPLAINT
23
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC
-1-
1
Plaintiffs TINA BOURI; SAMER BOURI; and BANDALI BOURI, by and through his
2
guardian ad litem, LUAY BOURI (“Plaintiffs”) and STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS
3
ASSOCIATION (“Stonebrae”); and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC.
4
(“HAS”) (collectively with Stonebrae, “Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”)
5
stipulate and respectfully request that the Initial Case Management Conference currently
6
scheduled for February 13, 2025 be continue to February 27, 2025 or, alternatively, March 13,
7
2025. The Parties further stipulate that the deadline for Defendants to response to Plaintiffs’
8
complaint be continued from January27, 2025 to February 28, 2025. The Parties believe good
9
cause exists based on the following:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
1. On October 1, 2024, the Court scheduled the Initial Case Management Conference for
January 2, 2025.
2. On December 20, 2024, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to
January 23, 2025.
3. On December 23, 2024, the Parties filed a stipulation continuing Defendants’ response
deadline to Plaintiffs’ Complaint to January 27, 2025.
4. On January 16, 2025, the Court continued the Initial Case Management Conference to
February 13, 2025.
5. Plaintiffs’ counsel is not available on February 13, 2025 due to a prepaid vacation abroad
from February 5, 2025 to February 20, 2025.
6. The Parties are available on February 27, 2025 for the Initial Case Management
21
Conference. Alternatively, the Parties are also available on March 13, 2025, or a date
22
sometime thereafter that is most convenient for the Court.
23
7. The Parties are working cooperatively to mediate this case and have filed a stipulation
24
requesting that the matter be referred to mediation. To facilitate the potential for an early
25
resolution, the Parties seek additional time to focus on settlement discussions rather than
26
proceeding immediately with briefing on a Rule 12 motion, which Defendants intend to
27
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC
-2-
28
1
file. Additional time is also necessary for the Parties to meet and confer regarding the
2
anticipated Rule 12 motion.
3
8.
Lastly, because Plaintiffs’ counsel will be unavailable from February 5, 2025, through
4
February 20, 2025, this period of unavailability overlaps with the briefing deadlines should
5
Defendants file their Rule 12 motion by the current deadline of January 27, 2025.
6
7
Respectfully submitted,
8
9
Date: January 22, 2025
ALLACCESS LAW GROUP
10
/s/ Irakli Karbelashvili
IRAKLI KARBELASHVILI, ESQ.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Dated: January 25, 2025
MURPHY, PEARSON, BRADLEY & FEENEY
By /s Keith G. Adams
Keith G. Adams
Attorneys for Defendants
STONEBRAE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
and HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATION SERVICES,
INC.
19
20
FILER’S ATTESTATION
21
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1, I hereby attest that on January 22, 2025, I, Irakli
22
Karbelashvili, received the concurrence of the signatories in the filing of this document.
23
24
25
/s/ Irakli Karbelashvili
Irakli Karbelashvili
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC
-3-
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Having reviewed the Parties’ stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Initial Case
3
March 13 2025 at 1:30 p.m. The deadline for
Management Conference is continued to __________,
4
Defendants to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint is continued to February 28, 2025.
5
6
7
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 27, 2025
_________________________
Hon. Lisa J. Cisneros
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING THE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND DEFENDANTS’ DEADLIEN TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06869-LJC
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?