Thomas

Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/07/2025. (jmd, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2025)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

EDWARD THOMAS,
Plaintiff,

6
7
8
9

Case No. 24-cv-07717-WHO (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.

10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

Plaintiff Edward Thomas has not responded to the Clerk’s Notices to (i) file a

12

complaint on this Court’s form, and (ii) file an application to proceed in forma pauperis

13

(IFP) or pay the $405.00 filing fee. (Dkt. Nos. 2 and 3.) Accordingly, this federal

14

mandamus action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with the

15

Clerk’s Notices and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

16

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Thomas may move to reopen. Any

17

such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page;

18

(ii) be accompanied by a complaint that appears on this Court’s form; and (iii) be

19

accompanied by a complete IFP application or full payment for the $405.00 filing fee.

20

The Clerk shall terminate all pending motions, enter judgment in favor of

21

defendant, and close the file.

22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: January 7, 2025
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge