Calvin v. Hallcon
Filing
22
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL AND DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT TIMELY FILED (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2025)Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff. Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 3/10/2025 (cl, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
YVETTE RENEE CALVIN,
Case No. 24-cv-08728-RS
Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
v.
12
13
HALLCON CORPORATION,
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL AND
DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT
TIMELY FILED
Defendant.
14
15
16
Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this action was granted on January 21,
17
2025, and plaintiff was given a deadline of February 28, 2025, by which to file any amended
18
complaint. As of March 6, 2025, no further filing by plaintiff appeared in the docket, with the
19
result that an order entered dismissing this action.
20
As it turns out, a document entitled “Motion to Amend” was received from plaintiff by the
21
February 28th deadline, but not entered into the docket until March 7, 2025. Moreover, although
22
labeled as a motion, the document effectively serves as the amended complaint plaintiff was
23
previously given leave to file. Accordingly, the prior dismissal is vacated. Docket No. 21 is
24
deemed to be the operative amended complaint in this action. Defendant’s time to respond to the
25
amended complaint shall run from the date of this order.
26
27
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: March 10, 2025
______________________________________
RICHARD SEEBORG
Chief United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 24-cv-08728-RS
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?