Calvin v. Hallcon

Filing 22

ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL AND DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT TIMELY FILED (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2025)Copy of order mailed to Plaintiff. Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) Modified on 3/10/2025 (cl, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 YVETTE RENEE CALVIN, Case No. 24-cv-08728-RS Plaintiff, 11 United States District Court Northern District of California v. 12 13 HALLCON CORPORATION, ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL AND DEEMING AMENDED COMPLAINT TIMELY FILED Defendant. 14 15 16 Defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint in this action was granted on January 21, 17 2025, and plaintiff was given a deadline of February 28, 2025, by which to file any amended 18 complaint. As of March 6, 2025, no further filing by plaintiff appeared in the docket, with the 19 result that an order entered dismissing this action. 20 As it turns out, a document entitled “Motion to Amend” was received from plaintiff by the 21 February 28th deadline, but not entered into the docket until March 7, 2025. Moreover, although 22 labeled as a motion, the document effectively serves as the amended complaint plaintiff was 23 previously given leave to file. Accordingly, the prior dismissal is vacated. Docket No. 21 is 24 deemed to be the operative amended complaint in this action. Defendant’s time to respond to the 25 amended complaint shall run from the date of this order. 26 27 28 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 5 Dated: March 10, 2025 ______________________________________ RICHARD SEEBORG Chief United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. 24-cv-08728-RS 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?