Branner v. Ayers, et al

Filing 331

ORDER by Judge D. Lowell Jensen granting 330 Petitioner's Ex parte Application/Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Relating to Opposition to Respondent's 329 MOTION TO RECONSIDER FINDINGS ON PROCEDURAL DEFAULT. Time enlar ged by 45 days. Petitioner to file and serve Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural Default by 9/8/2011. Respondent shall file and serve his Reply brief in Support of Respondent's Motion to Dismss 30 days thereafter, on or before 10/10/2011. Court shall set a hearing date if necessary. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/21/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
David Eiseman (Bar No. 114758)
Albert P. Bedecarré (Bar No. 148178)
2
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
4
5 Attorneys for Petitioner
Willie Branner
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

OAKLAND DIVISION

10
11
12

WILLIE BRANNER,
Petitioner,

13
vs.

14

MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden of California
15 State Prison at San Quentin,
16

CASE NO. C 90-3219 DLJ
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION FOR FIRST
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME RELATING
TO OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO RECONSIDER FINDINGS
ON PROCEDURAL DEFAULT

Respondent.

17
18
Having considered Petitioner Willie Branner’s (“Petitioner”) Ex Parte Application for

19
20
21

Enlargement of Time Relating to Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural
Default, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

22

1.

23
24

Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider Findings of Procedural Default is GRANTED.
2.

25
26
27
28

Petitioner’s Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time Relating to

Time shall enlarge by 45 days, and Petitioner shall file and serve his Opposition to

Respondent’s Motion to Reconsider Findings on Procedural Default on or before September 8,
2011.
Case No. C 90-3219 DLJ
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR FIRST
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME RELATING TO OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
FINDINGS ON PROCEDURAL DEFAULT

1

3.

Respondent shall file and serve his Reply Brief in support of Respondent’s Motion

2 to Dismiss 30 days thereafter, on or before October 10, 2011; and
3

4.

The Court shall set a hearing date if necessary.

4
5 DATED: July 21, 2011
6
7
8

HONORABLE D. LOWELL JENSEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. C 90-3219 DLJ
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR FIRST
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME RELATING TO OPPOSITION TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER
FINDINGS ON PROCEDURAL DEFAULT