Price v. Ayers
Filing
198
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 197 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED PETITION filed by Curtis Floyd Price. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 5/18/12. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
ROBERT L. MCGLASSON (GA Bar #492638)
ATTORNEY AT LAW
1024 Clairemont Avenue
Decatur, GA 30030
Telephone:
404 314 7664
Facsimile:
404 879 0005
rlmcglasson@comcast.net
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
JAN NIELSEN LITTLE - # 100029
jlittle@kvn.com
STEVEN A. HIRSCH - # 171825
shirsch@kvn.com
ASIM M. BHANSALI - # 194925
abhansali@kvn.com
STEVEN P. RAGLAND - # 221076
sragland@kvn.com
CODY S. HARRIS - # 255302
charris@kvn.com
633 Battery Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
Telephone:
415 391 5400
Facsimile:
415 397 7188
Attorneys for Petitioner
CURTIS FLOYD PRICE
17
DAVID H. ROSE
david.rose@doj.ca.gov
CA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE
455 Golden Gate Avenue., Suite 11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
Telephone:
415-703-5853
18
Attorney for Respondent Warden Ayers
15
16
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
20
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
21
CURTIS FLOYD PRICE,
22
23
24
Petitioner,
v.
25
ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., Warden of San
Quentin State Prison,
26
Case No. C-93-0277 PJH
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE
AMENDED PETITION
Judge:
Hon. Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
Respondent.
Date Filed: Jan. 25, 1993
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED PETITION
Case No. C-93-0277 PJH
666144.01
1
2
3
Pursuant to N.D. Civ. L.R. 6-2 and the accompanying Declaration of Jan N. Little, the
parties hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the Court issued an Order [Dkt. 196] on February 2, 2012, requiring the
4
Petitioner to file his amended federal habeas corpus petition within 120 days of that Order; the
5
Respondent to file its answer within 120 days of the filing of Petitioner’s amended petition; and
6
the Petitioner to file any reply 60 days later;
7
WHEREAS, this schedule requires Petitioner to file his amended petition by June 1, 2012;
8
WHEREAS, counsel for Petitioner have multiple scheduling conflicts that would make
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
meeting the June 1, 2012 deadline extremely burdensome, as set forth in the accompanying
Declaration of Jan N. Little;
WHEREAS, Petitioner therefore would request an additional 90 days to finalize and file
his amended habeas corpus petition; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has discussed this continuance with Respondent, who does not
oppose the continuance;
NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, through
16
their respective counsel of record, that the June 1, 2012 deadline for Petitioner to file his amended
17
habeas corpus petition be continued to September 1, 2012; that the Respondent’s deadline to file
18
its answer then be extended 135 days (to accommodate the holidays), to January 15, 2013; and
19
that the Petitioner’s deadline to file his reply be continued to March 15, 2013.
20
Dated: May 17, 2012
21
22
By:
/s/ Robert L. McGlasson
ROBERT L. MCGLASSON
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED PETITION
Case No. C-93-0277 PJH
666144.01
1
Dated: May 17, 2012
KEKER & VAN NEST LLP
2
By:
3
4
5
6
Attorneys for Petitioner
CURTIS FLOYD PRICE
7
8
/s/ Jan Nielsen Little
JAN NIELSEN LITTLE
STEVEN A. HIRSCH
ASIM M. BHANSALI
STEVEN P. RAGLAND
CODY S. HARRIS
Dated: May 17, 2012
9
10
By:
11
12
13
/s/ David H. Rose
DAVID H. ROSE
Deputy California Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Avenue, #11000
San Francisco, CA 94102-3664
Attorneys for Respondent
ROBERT L. AYERS, JR., Warden of San
Quentin State Prison
14
15
16
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
May 18
Dated: _________________, 2012
By: ____________________________________
HON. PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE AMENDED PETITION
Case No. C-93-0277 PJH
666144.01
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?